Thursday, 8 November 2018

Mission is the essence of the Church

                 

Jesus’ mandate to all Christians to proclaim the Gospel in word and deed,
Dialogue is a mystery of unity between Christians and those oriented to the Church DP28
There is no contradiction and opposition between dialogue & proclamation because they are related but not interchangeable RM 55.

Etymology of Word Mission
Heb Bible – Shalach (sent out), Gk Bib Apostello (I send), Lat Bib missus (sent out), mittere to send
Definition on Mission
YOU CAT: Mission is the essence of the Church and Jesus mandate to all Christians proclaims the Gospel in Word and deed, so that all men can freely make decision for Christ.”
AG :“The mission of the Church  is to fulfilled by that activity which makes her obeying the command of Christ and influenced by ways and love of the Holy Spirit fully present to all men and nations , in order that , by the example of her life and by her preaching  , by the sacraments and other means of grace , she may lead them to faith , the freedom and the peace of Christ ; that thus there may lie open beforethem, a firm and free role  to full participation in the mystery of Christ.”
Canon 786
Mission in terms of missionary activity probably Church so called, where by the Church is founded amongst the peoples or groups where it has not   taken root before, performs y by the Church is founded against the peoples or groups were  it has not taken root before, performs principally by the Church semi heralds of the Gospel , until such a time as the new churches are fullyconstituted , that is have their own resources and sufficient means , so that they themselves can carry on the work of evangelization.
EN. NO. 18: Mission is bringing Goods News into all strata of humanity, and through its influence transforming humanity from within and make it new”
The Origin and Purpose of Mission:
Origin: The Lord’s missionary mandate and Most Holy Trinity. The ultimate purpose of mission is none other to make men share tin the communion between the father and the Son in their Sprit of love.
Mission in the Old Testament
In O.T. mission is found in a primitive and less obvious way. God in the Old Testament, is presented as the “missionary God.” It is God who sends, for ex: Moses (Ex 3), Isaiah (Isa 6) Jeremiah (Jer 1:4-10) and Ezek.

-          Here God sends
-          God’s initiative
-          God’s decision
-          He can call anyone
-          He is acting on God’s behalf
-           Obedience to the will of God Full trust and courage
-          Empowered with God
-          It is the work of God
-           He speaks with authority  of God

Jesus commanded His disciples to go into the world and make disciples of all nations (Mt 28:16-20; Mark 16:14-18; Luke 24: 46-48; John 20:21; Acts 1:8).  This task of making disciples is the church’s work of missions.  This work is carried out by missionaries, churches, and other Para-church organizations around the world.  The purpose for the church’s mission’s initiative is essentially two fold:  to win converts and to disciple them onto maturity.  God brings people to repent and believe and live under that reign. God desires mature believers to rule in His Kingdom (cf. Matt 5:3-12; 24:42-47; 25:14-30; Eph 4:1-16; 1 Thess 1:12; 2 Tim 2:12; Rev 2:26-27; 3:21; 19:8; 21:7). 
Jn 20:21, “As the Father sent me so I send you”.
While all New Testament believers are certainly sent to be witnesses, not all are called to be missionaries. Missionaries have a special calling and usually expand their witness beyond the general locality of their church.  Their work usually involves traveling to an unreached region to proclaim the good news, set up churches, and further propagate the gospel.  The leaders of the church along with the laity are to support the endeavor of its missionaries.  All members of the church are to be unified and working for the Lord in all they do (Col 3:23).  Each has his own God given gift(s) which are critical for a unified, efficient missionary effort.
Thus, the church is charged with taking the good news of God’s grace and His kingdom to all people.  It is also charged with perpetuating itself with structure and leadership.  As believers mature, missionaries are sent, and churches are established, the mission of God will continue looking forward to the coming kingdom. 
Matthew 28:16- 20 Known as the “Great Commission,” Matthew challenges them to reach out to the Gentiles. This is a radical new thought to Jews. Matthew addresses two equal and opposite errors: “go, therefore” The followers of Jesus are the “sent people of God.” They believe that he is the Lord of all creation and they can not remain silent. If Jesus is really Lord, they must go and tell everyone. “make disciples” This is very important for Matthew because “disciple” is thename for the followers of Jesus, and not just the twelve that he originally called. These disciples are to make more disciples who resemble the first ones. It is not that the twelve were perfect, because God is the one who saves. The success of mission does not depend on the perfection of the missionary. Their job is to build up the church. Of course, the “church” that Matthew knew was very different from the church as we know it. But the point is that Jesus is sending them to build the church.
“All nations” The Greek is panta ta ethnos. But this reference to “nations” is not to our understanding of the modern nation state (US, Canada, China, etc.). As the Greek root suggests, it is a reference to “ethnic” groups or cultural groups or language groups. Jesus is Lord of all; therefore his disciples will work to see that every person can worship the Lord in his or her own language.
“Baptize” We are first of all called into becoming disciples. We are not matureor complete disciples when we are baptized. Baptism is a gift of grace, not areward for good works. It is an act of God whereby we partake in the promisedforgiveness and the new life which comes through the work of the Holy Spiritwithin us.
“Teach” Jesus commands those who go to make disciples and to “teach” them. This is not primarily intellectual information, but a change in the will that results in a decision to follow Jesus and submit to God’s will as revealed by Jesus. Becoming a Christian does not just understand certain prepositional truths. It is not just words, but deeds which match those words more closely each day. This is a teaching in which there is no room for hypocrisy, as if we are more deserving than others. Those who are disciples will practice what Jesus taught. God’s reign of righteousness will require a costly discipleship.
“With you always…” Matthew does not include in his story an account of theascension. His focus in on the always present Lord who walks with his peoplewhom he has sent out.
Mk 16: 15-16 “And he said to them “Go into all the world and proclaim the Good Newsto the whole creation. The one who believes and is baptized will be saved but the one who does not believe will be condemned”.
John 10/10 “I came that they may have life and have it abundantly”. Mission means Giving life”
Life is also means shalom whole being, social being, relationship with people. Mission means giving life.

Luke 4:16 – 30 = Jesus defines his mission with his very first appearance inpublic. He reads from the prophet Isaiah and claims that he is the fulfillment ofIsaiah’s prophecy. Jesus does not suggest that the poor are without sin. Sinfulness isrooted in the human heart. Both the materially rich and thematerially poor can be spiritually poor. Salvation comes withrepentance and forgiveness. This salvation is available even to theoutsider who is welcomed at the banquet table which Jesus hasprepared.At the very beginning of his ministry, Jesus makes clear his understanding of God’s universal love for all people. Jesus seeshis particular work to be among the Jews, but on several occasionshe demonstrates this larger vision in his interaction with Gentiles.All of this sets the stage for the early church to launch its missionto the Gentiles.
Acts 1:8 - What he begins in Luke he continues in Acts. So it is not surprising that Lukebegins his “Acts of the Apostles” with the final words of instruction from Jesus.As noted above, Jesus focused his ministry among Jews. Even Paul, the apostleto the Gentiles, stops first in the synagogue when he comes to a new city. But theLord’s last words were that his disciples were to move out in concentric circles.In fact, Luke divides Acts into these geographical parts.It is clear from this text that mission is God’s mission, (missiodei) not ours. Onlywhen the Holy Spirit acts will the sent ones become witnesses. It is not so much acommand as it is a promise. God does not force us into mission, but those whoare indwelled by the Holy Spirit can not help but respond.
TheGospel and the salvation that comes to those who repent and believe is such goodnews that we can not help but tell others.If mission is Spirit led, and then it must exhibit the fruit of the Spirit. Mission that grows out of pride or superiority or arrogance has no placein Jesus’ plan. David Bosch suggests that we go in “bold humility.”This one verse eliminates any geographical definition of mission. God’s missionis for all people in all places. It is not simply to the “less fortunate” however wemight be superiorly inclined to define them.
John 20:21 - Jesus loved the sinner and recognized that all of us are sinners. He hated sin andwanted to forgive our sin so that we could be restored to fellowship with God. Hehad no time for a self-righteous legalism, but neither did he have any time for aself-absorbed ignoring of God’s laws for humankind. He loved the sinner but hewould not wink at sin because he knew that sin brings death.It is clear from Jesus words that we are called out of the world to repentance andforgiveness for the purpose of learning a new way of living. Part of that new lifeis being sent into the world to announce the reign of God and invite other torepent and believe and be restored in fellowship with God and others.
Mk: 1/15 “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near, repent and believe in the Good News”
Mt 4/17: “Repent for the Kingdom of heaven has come near” 
Mk 3/14-15: “And he appointed twelve, whom he also namedapostle, to be with him, and to be sent out to proclaim the message, and have anything to cast out demons”
Mt 16/19-20:
Lk 10/ 1-12
Lk 24/ 47-48
CCC   On Mission
Mission a Requirement of the Churches’ Catholicity:
The Missionary mandate: Having been divinely sent to the nations that she might be the universal sacrament of salvation’, the Church, in obedience to the command of her founder and because it id demanded by her own essential universality, strives to preach the Gospel to all men” “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the son  and of the Holy Sprit, teaching them to observe that I have commanded you; and  no that I am with you always , until the close of the age”(849).
Missionary Motivation:
It is from God’s love for all men that the Church in every age receives both the obligation and vigor of her missionary dynamism, “for the love of Christ urges us on.” Indeed God desires all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of truth”, that is God will the salvation of every one through the knowledge of truth. Salvation is found in the truth. Those who obey the prompting of the Sprit of truth are already on the ay of salvation. But the Church , to whom this truth has been entrusted , must go out to meet their desire , so as to bring them truth , Because she believes in God’s universal plan of salvation , the Church must be missionary.  
Missionary Paths: The Holy Sprit is the protagonist, “The principal agent of the whole of the Church’s mission. It is he who leads the Church on her missionary path. . ‘The mission continued and, and in the course of history, unfolds the emission of Christ, who was sent   to evangelize the poor, so the Church, urged on by the Sprit of Christ, must walk the road Christ himself walked, a way of poverty and obedience, of service and self sacrifice even to death, a death from which he emerged victorious by his resurrection.” So is it that ‘the blood of martyrs is the seed of Christians.”852
How do we understand and define mission today? Some twentyfiveyears after the council, Pope John Paul II in a key documenton mission described mission in this way: “Proclamation is thepermanent priority of mission. The Church cannot elude Christ’sexplicit mandate, nor deprive men and women of the ‘Good News’about their being loved and saved by God” (RM 44). The popewrote about mission as “a single but complex reality, and it developsin a variety of ways” (41).
“The witness of a Christian life isthe first and irreplaceable form of mission” (42), and such witnessincludes a “commitment to peace, justice, human rights andhuman promotion” (42). Other elements of mission involve forminglocal churches (48–50), incarnating the gospel in all cultures(52–54), dialoguing with brothers and sisters of other religions(55–57), and promoting development by forming consciences(58–59). Earlier, Pope Paul VI drew the definition of mission fromthe central message and explicit purpose of Jesus to preach thegood news of the kingdom/reign of God (EN 6) and also pointedout that mission has many elements (17–18), must respect cultureand the context (20), and does not always require words(21). This last idea is captured nicely by the phrase associated with Francis of Assisi: “Preach always, and if necessary use words.”
Discipleship as an important aspect of mission is underlined by all gospels.
The church is called to follow Christ's example. Mission in Christ's way means Matt 28:18-20 together with such texts as Matt 27:41-42 (the temptation on the cross) and with Matt 16:24-25, where Jesus tells his disciples: "If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me." It means that the "crusading mind" has to be replaced by the "crucified mind".
Mathew:The content and conditions of discipleship in the lifetime of Jesus are illustrated most clearly in the mission discourse in Matt 10:1-42. The mandate given to the disciples in this chapter includes a call for poverty and simple lifestyle. What is demanded from Jesus is an attitude: freedom from acquisitiveness and a trust in providence so absolutely that it can wholly dispense with even the minimum of material resources. Poverty and powerlessness are for Matthew an absolutely indispensable part of Christian Mission.
Mark: The call to discipleship is also an important aspect of Mark's gospel. "The way of Jesus is the way of the disciples, and discipleship consists in walking the way of Jesus. This is the meaning of akolouthein, to follow, in the gospel of Mark". "The members of Mark's community would easily read themselves into his portrait of the disciples on their way up to Jerusalem"
John 20:21 “This must determine the way we think about and carry out themission; it must be founded and modeled upon his. We are not authorized to doit in any other way.” We are not Jesus and we can not become Jesus, but we can “have the mind ofChrist” and we can become like him. So we need to become intimatelyacquainted with the life of Jesus and how he exhibited the reign of God in theworld. Our witness and our way of witness in the world must be consistent withhis.Jesus loved the sinner and recognized that all of us are sinners. He hated sin andwanted to forgive our sin so that we could be restored to fellowship with God. Hehad no time for a self-righteous legalism, but neither did he have any time for aself-absorbed ignoring of God’s laws for humankind. He loved the sinner but hewould not wink at sin because he knew that sin brings death.It is clear from Jesus words that we are called out of the world to repentance andforgiveness for the purpose of learning a new way of living. Part of that new lifeis being sent into the world to announce the reign of God and invite other torepent and believe and be restored in fellowship with God and others. We are
“sent” (the core meaning of the word “mission”) so that we can be witnesses. Butit is always the Holy Spirit that draws people to God, not our mission programs.
. Mission is a central theme in the whole bible. We shall see that mission is not only aninterference in someone else’s life, but a plan of God in accordance with His word. Mission is the will ofGod!!! Without the bible there will be no Christian mission. John Stott gives us four reasons for Christianmission:
- The bible gives us the mandate;
- The bible gives us the message;
- The bible gives us the model;
- The bible gives us the power.
Particular the first reason is very actual and relevant in our time. Stott says our mandate is found:
• in the creation of God (because of which all human beings are responsible to him)
• in the character of God (as outgoing, loving, compassionate, not willing that any should perish, desiring thatall should come to repentance)
• in the promises of God (that all nations will be blessed through Abraham's seed and will become theMessiah's inheritance)
• in the Christ of God (now exalted with universal authority, to receive universal acclaim)
• in the Spirit of God (who convicts of sin, witnesses to Christ, and impels the Church to evangelize)
• in the Church of God (which is a multinational, missionary community, under orders to evangelize untilChrist returns). The biblical mandate for world evangelization cannot be escaped.
In this track we will focus on mission in the Old Testament. Some people think that the Old Testament tellsus nothing about mission because the focus is mainly on Israel. But this is a misunderstanding; the theme ofmission is very clear in Gods revelation and his promises to all people. It pronounces from the character of God, from His aims and from what He suspects from His people.
The Place of Mission in New Testament Theology
Mission is the church sent into the world, to love, to serve, to preach, to teach, to heal, to liberate. This comprehensive understanding of mission is often defined by the threefold task of the church: witness (martyrìd), service (diakonid) and communion (koinonid). At least four aspects of mission can be discerned
1. Mission as being sent out (especially John);
2. Mission as making disciples of all nations (Matthew);
3. Mission as deliverance and emancipatory action (Luke);
4. Mission as witness (Acts; John).
The passage of Acts 1:8 does not belong to the category of a missionary charge in the strict sense of the word. But it has often been considered in this way. Jesus' words
‘You shall be my witnesses to the end of the earth...” have commonly been read as an imperative. But both in Acts 1:8 and in Luke 24:48 there is an ambiguity between promise and task. In the future tense of Acts 1:8 the main emphasis is on promise. It is not primarily a “command.”
‘Luke's pneumatology excludes the possibility of a missionary command', it implies, rather, a promise that the disciples will get involved in mission.”
Acts 1:8 reminds us that "witness (one can say: mission) will simply be 'a matter of being.' And one does not have to be obedient in order to be, as being precedes obeying. Our being as Christians is therefore a being as witnesses in mission; there is no need to take a decision first to be obedient to the Great Commission" .
To speak of mission as a mandate or a command is certainly an important aspect of the New Testament. However, if mission is interpreted only in that way, there is the risk that it becomes a legalistic obedience.
Here we might learn from Paul's hermeneutic. It is interesting to see how he interprets a saying of the Lord in 1 Cor 9:14: "In the same way the Lord gave instruction that those who preach the Gospel should earn their living by the Gospel" (see Matt 10:10). In the chapter as a whole Paul defends his work to support himself in spite of his right as an apostle to be supported by the communities (1 Cor 9:1-5).
Dialogue:
Dialogue can be understood in different ways. Firstly, at the purely human level, it means reciprocal communication, leading to a common goal or, at a deeper level, to interpersonal communion. Secondly, dialogue can be taken as an attitude of respect and friendship, which permeates or should permeate all those activities constituting the evangelizing mission of the Church. This can appropriately be called “the spirit of dialogue”. Thirdly, in the context of religious plurality, dialogue means “all positive and constructive interreligious relations with individuals and communities of other faiths which are directed at mutual understanding and enrichment”, in obedience to truth and respect for freedom. It includes both witness and the exploration of respective religious convictions. It is in this third sense that the present document uses the term dialogue for one of the integral elements of the Church's evangelizing mission.
Both RM and DP Speak with conviction of the need for interreligious dialogue understood as method and means of mutual knowledge andenrichment. So understood, dialogue is not in opposition to the mission ad gentes; indeed it has a special link with that mission and is one of its expressions(RM 55)The Pope is convinced that dialogue does not originate form tactical considerations or self interest but is an activity with its own dignity, requirements and guiding principles.  It emerges out of deep respect for everything that has been brought about in human beings by the Sprit who blows where he wills. Through dialogue , the Church seeks to uncover the seeds of the Word a ray of the truth which enlightens all men …… found in individuals an din the religious traditions of human kind (56). Dialogue should be conducted and implemented with the conviction that the Church is the ordinary means of salvation and she alone possess the fullness of the means of salvation (55).  Dialogue is thus viewed as culminating in the person and mission of Jesus Christ. In and through history God progressively manifests himself to and communicates with human kind.
God himself is in continuousdialogue with human kind,offering his love andsalvation to us. In faithfulness to the divine initiative, the Church too must enter into a dialogue of salvation with all men and women. This dialogue finds its place within the Church’s salvificmission Inter religious dialogue does not merely aim at mutual understanding and friendly relations. It reaches the level of the Sprit, hwere exchange and sharing becomes witness to one’s beliefs and a common exploration of each one’s religious conviction. Sinceredialogue implies on the one hand mutual acceptance of differences, or even of contradictions,on the other hand respect for the free decision of persons taken according to the dictates of their conscience (DP 41)
Dialogue began as a literary method or as a method of searching for truth. In the past, dialogue often meant discussion or controversy to establish one’s own position as the true one. In modern psychology fantasy and inter –personal dialogue are means foe solving personal problems. In business, politics and in all fields of life dialogue is today seen as the only reasonable, human and efficient way to solve problems and achieve all round growth. Dialogue is the only human and divine way of living and acting; since we are the very images of the Holy Trinity whose life is nothing but a dialogue.In a pluralistic world, in a world characterized by Mannes and complementary, dialogue will ever remain a process and a   goal. Dialogue is like love or, as the Hindu devotees say of bhakti, the means in our attainment of the supreme goal and the end itself because the ultimate destiny is nothing but an unending dialogue in the very heart of God. Hence dialogue can never disappear from this world. Plurality will remain and so will dialogue that springs from love and truth and that takes men and women into grater love and grater harmony.Dialogue by its nature an “announcing”, a ‘proclamation”, a “witnessing”, a giving reason r the reason for our hope.’ From our Christianangle, every Christian dialogue partner is invited and invites the other to be further converted to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the only God we know and love.
Dialogue reveals the courage of a new humanism, since it demands trust in humankind; it never sets one against another, and its aim is to eliminate the distances and smooth out the rough edges to give growth to the awareness that all are creatures of the one God, brothers and sisters, therefore, of the one, same humanity .
Two typed of Dialogue:
-           Sprit of Dialogue
-           Dialogue is the part of mission
The Aims of Dialogue: -
-           It is a method and means of mutual knowledge 
-           Enrichment  DP Article 55 
-           God is present in many ways not only to be individuals about also to entire people through these spiritual riches which the religions are the main and essential expressions. (DPArticles 55.)
Theological Foundation of Dialogue
First comes the fact that the whole of humankind forms one family, due to the common origin of all men and women, created by God in his own image. Correspondingly, all are called to a common destiny, the fullness of life in God. Moreover, there is but one plan of salvation for humankind, with its centre in Jesus Christ, who in his incarnation “has united himself in a certain manner to every person” (RH 13; GS 22.2).Finally, there needs to be mentioned the active presence of the Holy Spirit in the religious life of the members of the other religious traditions. From all this the Pope concludes to a “mystery of unity" which was manifested clearly at Assisi, in spite of the differences between religious professions (DP 28).
The fruits of the Spirit of God in the personal life of individuals, whether Christian or otherwise, are easily discernible (Gal 5:22-23). To identify in other religious traditions elements of grace capable of sustaining the positive response of their members to God's invitation is much more difficult. It requires a discernment for which criteria have to be established. Sincere individuals marked by the Spirit of God have certainly put their imprint on the elaboration and the development of their respective religious traditions. It does not follow, however, that everything in them is good. (DP 30)
To say that the other religious traditions include elements of grace does not imply that everything in them is the result of grace. For sin has been at work in the world, and so religious traditions, notwithstanding their positive values, reflect the limitations of the human spirit, sometimes inclined to choose evil. An open and positive approach to other religious traditions cannot overlook the contradictions which may exist between them and Christian revelation. It must, where necessary, recognize that there is incompatibility between some fundamental elements of the Christian religion and some aspects of such traditions. (DP 31)
The Church has been willed by God and instituted by Christ to be, in the fullness of time, the sign and instrument of the divine plan of salvation (LG 1), the centre of which is the mystery of Christ. She is the “universal sacrament of salvation” (LG 48), and is “necessary for salvation”(LG 14). The Lord Jesus himself inaugurated her mission “by preaching the good news, that is, the coming of God's Kingdom”
The relationship between the Church and the Kingdom is mysterious and complex. As Vatican II teaches, “principally the Kingdom is revealed in the person of Christ himself.” Thus “the Kingdom is inseparable from the Church, because both are inseparable from the person and work of Jesus himself... It is therefore not possible to separate the Church from the Kingdom as if the first belonged exclusively to the imperfect realm of history, while the second would be the perfect eschatological fulfillment of the divine plan of salvation”(34)
To the Church, as the sacrament in which the Kingdom of God is present “in mystery”, are related or oriented (ordinantur) (LG 16) the members of other religious traditions who, inasmuch as they respond to God's calling as perceived by their conscience, are saved in Jesus Christ and thus already share in some way in the reality which is signified by the Kingdom. The Church's mission is to foster “the Kingdom of our Lord and his Christ” (Rev 11:15), at whose service she is placed (35).
The Church on earth is always on pilgrimage. Although she is holy by divine institution her members are not perfect; they bear the mark of their human limitations. Consequently, her transparency as sacrament of salvation is blurred. This is the reason why the church herself, ‘insofar as she is an institution of men here on earth,” and not only her members, is constantly in need of renewal and reform (36)
Against this background it becomes easier to see why and in what sense interreligious dialogue is an integral element of the Church's evangelizing mission. The foundation of the Church's commitment to dialogue is not merely anthropological but primarily theological. God, in an age-long dialogue, has offered and continues to offer salvation to humankind. In faithfulness to the divine initiative, the Church too must enter into a dialogue of salvation with all men and women. (38)
In the Apostolic Exhortation Novo MillennioIneunte, the Pope stresses the Importance of openness in the dialogue with the followers of other religions. He isconvinced that dialogue is a more meaningful method for creating the climate of harmonyand peace to treat challenging situations of today's world, conflicted by war, and culturaland religious pluralism(66)He says:In the climate of increased cultural and religious pluralism which is expected to markthe society of the new millennium, it is obvious that this dialogue will be especially Important in establishing a sure basis for peace and warding off the dread spectre ofthose wars of religion which have so often bloodied human history. The name of theone God must become increasingly what it is: a name of peace and a summons topeace. (67)
Proclamation
“Proclamation or announcing in contrast is the communication of the Gospel message, the mystery of salvation realized by God for all in Jesus Christ by the power of the Holy Sprit. It is an invitation to our commitment of faith, in Jesus Christ and entry through baptism in the community of believers which is the Church”.Proclamation is the permanent priority of mission.
-           The Church cannot elude Christ's explicit mandate, nor deprive men and women of the “Good News” about their being loved and saved by God.
-          Evangelization will always contain-as the foundation, center and at the same time the summit of its dynamism-a clear proclamation that, in Jesus Christ...salvation is offered to all people, as a gift of God's grace and mercy.
-          All forms of missionary activity are directed to this proclamation, which reveals and gives access to the mystery hidden for ages and made known in Christ (Eph 3:3-9; Col 1:25-29), the mystery which lies at the heart of the Church's mission and life, as the hinge on which all evangelization turns.
-          In the complex reality of mission, initial proclamation has a central and irreplaceable role, since it introduces man “into the mystery of the love of God, who invites him to enter into a personal relationship with himself in Christ” and opens the way to conversion.
-          Faith is born of preaching, and every ecclesial community draws its origin and life from the personal response of each believer to that preaching. Just as the whole economy of salvation has its center in Christ, so too all missionary activity is directed to the proclamation of his mystery.
       -  The subject of proclamation is Christ who was crucified, died and is risen: through him is accomplished our full and authentic liberation from evil, sin and death; through him God bestows “new life” that is divine and eternal. This is the “Good News” which changes man and his history, and which all peoples have a right to hear.
- Proclamation is inspired by faith, which gives rise to enthusiasm and fervor in the missionary.
     - The missionary's enthusiasm in proclaiming Christ comes from the conviction that he is responding to that expectation, and so he does not become discouraged or cease his witness even when he is called to manifest his faith in an environment that is hostile or indifferent.
   -  He knows that the Spirit of the Father is speaking through him (Mt 10:17-20; Lk 12:11-12) and he can say with the apostles: “We are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit” (Acts 5:32). He knows that he is not proclaiming a human truth, but the "word of God,” which has an intrinsic and mysterious power of its own (Rom 1:16)
Dialogue and proclamation both are elements of the evangelizing mission of the Church. But both are not on the same level. They are inter related, but not inter changeable. In inter religious dialogue a Christian wishes to make Jesus Christ better known and loved. And the proclamation of Jesus Christ is to be carried out in the Gospel sprit of Dialogue. Both dialogue and proclamation imply certain sensitivity to the social, cultural, religious and political aspects ob the situation, and to the signs of the times through which the Spritof God is speaking, teaching and guiding. Dialogue has also a prophetic role: in bearing witness to Gospel values, it raises questions for all religions.
Though dialogue and proclamation are interrelated, still RM and DP repeatedly say: Dialogue does not constitute the whole mission of the Church; it cannot replace proclamation but remains oriented towards proclamation in so far as the dynamic process of the Church’s evangelizing mission reaches in its climax and its fullness ……Christians in dialogue have the duty of responding to partners regarding …. Thefaith.When this is called for, of giving an account of the hope that is within them (1 Pe3/15).DP82. Both dialogue and proclamation are based on genuine love. Our deep love for the lord Jesus motivates us to share with others the faith we possess. 
Dialogue and proclamation cannot be really understood and appreciated without deeper understanding of the relationship between the different religious communities. A monologue is a communication which refuses to listen, or at least is indifferent to the others, their problems, experience, depths and heights. Both dialogue and proclamation are communication, not mere verbal communication but also the communication of one’s own self. In inter religious dialogue and proclamation what is revealed is the world of the Transcendent, the transcendent enters into communication with us, the way we respond to the Supreme Being. So both dialogue and proclamation are inter cultural, inter religious, and inter worldly view “announcing” (proclamation) necessarily includes all the characteristics of dialogue as we understand it today. If proclamation is not dialogical it degenerates into a meaningless monologue where no response id expected. Dialogue not the denial of proclamation but its affirmation in a genuine Christian sense.  Proclamation i.e., witnessing, to Jesus Christ and to the love and truth of the Father that Jesus revels, is better understood today as the way God proclaims hiselfivsalvation history and Jesus proclaims the father to his hearers. W e cannot so separate dialogue and proclamation as though dialogue necessarily leads to proclamation. Both can only exist together. Both are rooted in love and in truth.  Our modern self understanding , which is itself a gift of God , and a reflection on yhrrealities of our faith force us to move forward from a ‘monological” proclamation of the  “Good News” to a more enlightened “ dialogical proclamation” of Jesus and his kingdom and to “a witnessing dialogue” in all our contacts  with different  persons and groups. Both call for total openness. They demand from us the readiness to move out of our own selfish narrowness. They demand the aptitude not to project one ’s self, views, attitudes and feelings on others.
DP 79 says:both are authentically elements of mission. Both are legitimate and necessary for mission. They are intimately related but not interchangeable. Both related one mission of the Church.
Article 78 Sometimes due to circumstances dialogue becomes the only way dialogue has a prophetic role. Prophetic role means, I have to be changed. Withoutconversion, dialogue has no meaning.
Articles: 80when Church allows having Dialogue among themselves among Hindus and Muslimsbecause Church is sacrament of community among people.
Article 82: Dialogue andproclamation are the ways in carrying out one mission of the Church. But dialogue cannot replace proclamation.It is oriented towards proclamation.Dialogue remains oriented towards proclamation in a dynamic process of church’s mission which reaches in climax in proclamation.
Redemptoris Missio emphasis on proclamation. Dialogue and Proclamation emphasis on dialogue. Dialogue should mot be undervalued. RM Ecclesio Centric. DP Christo Centric. Dialogue possesses its on validity. RM permanent priority is proclamation. RM proclamation is important because logical, ideal, theological important central and irreplaceable role. Dialogue remains oriented towards proclamation in a dynamic process of Churches mission which reveals in climax in proclamation. Dialogue proclaims Jesus is the only Savior.
Proclamation is the expression of the Church's awareness of being in mission. Dialogue is the expression of its awareness of God's presence and action outside its boundaries. Proclamation is the affirmation of and witness to God's action in oneself and in the Church. Dialogue is the openness and attention to the mystery of God's action in the other believer. We cannot speak of one without the other. Thus, interreligious dialogue is a form of sharing, of giving and receiving. It is not a one-way process. It must really be a dialogue, not a monologue.
Interreligious dialogue and proclamation, though not on the same level, are both authentic elements of the Church's evangelizing mission. Both are legitimate and necessary. They are intimately related, but not interchangeable. The two activities remain distinct, but . . . one and Dialogue and proclamation are not identical but related. At any time or place within the course of our living in dialogue, moments for proclamation of the Gospel may be given. For Christians, proclamation is the sharing of the Good news about God’s action in history through Jesus Christ. Proclamation is made in other ways besides dialogue, but should always be made in the spirit of dialogue. On the other hand, dialogue may include proclamation, since it must always be undertaken in the spirit of those who have good news to share. 
 Dialogue with Our Brothers and Sisters of Other Religions
55. Inter-religious dialogue is a part of the Church's evangelizing mission. Understood as a method and means of mutual knowledge and enrichment, dialogue is not in opposition to the mission ad gentes; indeed, it has special links with that mission and is one of its expressions. This mission, in fact, is addressed to those who do not know Christ and his Gospel, and who belong for the most part to other religions. In Christ, God calls all peoples to himself and he wishes to share with them the fullness of his revelation and love. He does not fail to make himself present in many ways, not only to individuals but also to entire peoples through their spiritual riches, of which their religions are the main and essential expression, even when they contain "gaps, insufficiencies and errors."98 All of this has been given ample emphasis by the Council and the subsequent Magisterium, without detracting in any way from the fact that salvation comes from Christ and that dialogue does not dispense from evangelization.99
In the light of the economy of salvation, the Church sees no conflict between proclaiming Christ and engaging in interreligious dialogue. Instead, she feels the need to link the two in the context of her mission ad gentes. These two elements must maintain both their intimate connection and their distinctiveness; therefore they should not be confused, manipulated or regarded as identical, as though they were interchangeable.
I recently wrote to the bishops of Asia: "Although the Church gladly acknowledges whatever is true and holy in the religious traditions of Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam as a reflection of that truth which enlightens all people, this does not lessen her duty and resolve to proclaim without fail Jesus Christ who is 'the way, and the truth and the life.'...The fact that the followers of other religions can receive God's grace and be saved by Christ apart from the ordinary means which he has established does not thereby cancel the call to faith and baptism which God wills for all people."100 Indeed Christ himself "while expressly insisting on the need for faith and baptism, at the same time confirmed the need for the Church, into which people enter through Baptism as through a door." 101 Dialogue should be conducted and implemented with the conviction that the Church is the ordinary means of salvation and that she alone possesses the fullness of the means of salvation.102

 Fr. Albert Leo, CPPS

Precious Blood Missionaries

Priestly celibacy


“Priestly celibacy has been guarded by the Church for centuries as a brilliant jewel, and retains its value undiminished even in our time when the outlook of men and the state of the world have undergone such profound changes” (SacerdotalisCaelibatus).
Introduction
Clerical celibacy is a traditional practice of the Catholic Church where all the ordained ministers remain unmarried. Theologically speaking this is an attempt to imitate the life of Jesus with regard to chastity and the sacrifice of married life for the “sake of the Kingdom” (Lk 18:28-30, Mt 19:27-30; Mk 10:20-21).But today we live in a cultural climate which undervalues the genuine sexuality. The concept of sexuality has been distorted to suit the framework of the modern consumerist world. As a result the value and meaning of priestly celibacy in not well understood and appreciated. The priestly celibacy in the Catholic Church is being questioned and disputed at regular intervals. Its value for priestly ministry is challenged as there is no strict connection between priesthood and celibacy. One may legitimately ask, is the clerical celibacy absolutely necessary for the priestly ministry? Is it a help for pastoral ministry? Is it a hindrance to exercise the priestly office?  Yet, the Catholic Church treasures this tradition of several centuries going back to the apostles. She will not change this practice that easily. This is clear in the words of Pope John Paul II in his letter to priests of the Church on Holy Thursday 1979:
The Latin Church has wished, and continues to wish, referring to the example of Christ the Lord Himself, to the apostolic teaching to the whole Tradition that is proper to her, that all those who receive the sacrament of Orders should embrace this renunciation ‘for the sake of the kingdom of heaven’.
It is interesting to reflect why the Catholic Church has been guarding the priestly celibacy as brilliant jewel and its value for centuries?
1. The Origin of priestly Celibacy
When did the law of celibacy begin? Is it of apostolic origin? We have different opinions and views expressed. Taking the example of St. Peter, many would jump into the conclusion that it is not of apostolic origin. Christian Cochini in his scholarly work, The Apostolic Origins of Priestly Celibacy would trace its origin to the apostolic times. Tertullian wrote in his treatise on An Exhortation to Chastity (208-212) Men and women in ecclesiastical orders owe their position to continence and slay in themselves the concupiscence of lust. Epiphanus of Salamis maintains that the priest must be celibate because he engages in worship, they should be available to God”.Eusebius of Caesarea was of the opinion that, “those who proclaim and teach the Word of God must zealously renounce marriage in order to dedicate themselves to the performance of loftier deeds. The law of celibacy grew gradually beginning with the Council of Elvira (306), asking clerics to abstain from conjugal intercourse ‘as a sign and consequence of his new consecration as a minister of the Church’. Then Council of Carthage (390) confirmed this practice and stipulated that married clerics had to observe continence with their wives on the basis of a tradition originating with the Apostles. But this regulation was not fully accepted by all. Only with the ecclesiastical laws promulgated by Gregory VII (1073-1785) reaffirmed the norms concerning continence of the clergy and the prohibition of marriage for clerics in major orders.
In the East, the Council of Nicea(325), absolutely forbids a bishop, presbyter, deacon, or any one of the clergy to keep a woman(excepting mother, sister, aunt). According to Christian Cochini even in the East by the time of the Council of Carthage (390) celibacy for the priests was highly esteemed. The Council in Trullan (692) summoned by emperor Justinian II, bishops were asked to practice continence, if married they were asked to get separated from their wives. But the law of celibacy was not followed strictly by all the presbyters. There were a lot of abuses. Therefore the First Lateran Council in 1123 absolutely forbid priests, deacons, or sub-deacons to live with concubines and wives.Subsequently the Second Lateran Council (1139) said: “those who had taken wives are to be deprived of their position… it is unbecoming that they give themselves up to marriage and impurity” (canon 6).
The Council of Trentin canons 9 and 10 states that the celibacy was not a divine law but church had the right toprohibit sacerdotal marriage by the reason ecclesiastical law or vow. Though the church held sacerdotal celibacy in such high regard, it did not minimize its regard for marriage. Clergy was expected to implore the grace of god in the vow of celibacy.
Johann Adam Mohler (1796-1838),also called the Father of Modern Theology, was a great German theologian. He dismisses the objection that celibacy stunts growth in love, isolating person in his own selfishness. Pope Pious IX, in his first encyclical Qui pluribus on 1846, underlined the need of priestly celibacy. Pope Pius XI, inAd CatholiciSacerdoti mentions one of the ancient sayings, “approach the God chastely”. This encyclical makes reference to Council of Elvira and of Carthage in support of the law of celibacy”.
2. Opposition and Objections to priestly Celibacy
But the Opposition to the law regarding celibacy of the Church was not lacking and occasionally well-respected figures argued for a mitigation of the law to help solve the problems of clerical indiscipline. Panormitanus of Italy (1386-1445), one of the eminent canonist of his time strongly endorsed priestly marriage. He added that the continence was not a part of the substance of the order for secular clerics, nor was it a part of divine law.The reformers did not give any value to clerical celibacy. Zwingli and Martin Luther made the abolition of clerical celibacy a key element to their reform, but this was also related to the dismantling of the traditional theology of the sacramental priesthood. And in the recent time Edward Schillebeeckx (b. 1914), a theologian of our own time moving away from the main stream Catholic understanding of priestly celibacy.  He does not think that the law of celibacy is a help for pastoral work.  He proposes optional celibacy and wants the Church should change, should give way to the right of the community towards ministry.
There is opinion that clerical celibacy cannot be an ideal for the priest to live on today. It prevents the priest to be a part of the people for whom he is sent, makes it difficult for him to be one with them, to understand the various domestic problems as he has no family of his own. As a law imposed on the clergy celibacy is not tenable as Christ himself called married men for the spread of the gospel, especially he did not say anything about the law of celibacy. Jesus did not establish any necessary relation between the priesthood and celibacy. The most practical reasons is that since it is unnatural for men to be celibate, its absence will solve the problem of shortage of priests, to prevent certain priests by the clergy. The non-Catholic Churches and ecclesial communities do have married clergy and thus optional celibacy helps the Catholic Church to carry on ecumenical relations in a better way.
3. Church’s Response
Church denies the validity and logic of these objections. It is true that there is really a shortage of priests in the Church but it cannot be remedied by abolishing priestly celibacy. Priestly vocations are on the decrease even in the Churches where they have not law of celibacy. One cannot argue that abolishing the rule of celibacy would help the Catholic Church to improve the ecumenical relations with other Christian communities. Ecumenism is not giving up the age old traditions and practices of the Catholic Church. Raymond Brown would argue that ecumenical commitment of the Catholic Church explicitly demands celibate priests. The discipline of celibacy among priests is one of the distinctive marks of the Catholic tradition of the Latin rite. Anyone who chooses to become a priest accepts the discipline. The Eastern Churches have their own tradition and historical reasons for optional celibacy. To compare one Church tradition with another is not at all accepted and practical for the ministry of the Church.
            Amidst these objections and oppositions thechurch has alwaysguarded it as precious jewel and maintained it as law. Vatican II and post Vatican II Documents and Synods have made it very clear that church will continue to retain the value of celibacy undiminished in all circumstances and changes of the world. They also explain what exactly the churches’ understanding of the priestly celibacy is and why church continues to preserve it as precious jewel and hold it as great value.
4. Priestly Celibacy in the Conciliar and Post-Conciliar Documents
Presbyterorumordinis:Celibacy is to be embraced and esteemed as a gift (PO 16). Priesthood is not a function, but a mission it engages the whole of existence of a person, so celibacy befits the priesthood. The law of celibacy is not absolutely necessary. It is not required by the nature of priesthood as in Christ the priesthood did not require celibacy as an indispensable.
But the priestly mission of Christ did make it appropriate that the ordained should renounce a family of his own. Vatican II emphasized this appropriateness by saying that celibacy enables the priests to better actualise his consecration to Christ with undivided love it affords greater freedom to serve the kingdom of god, to practice perfect charity in the pastoral missing: it extends spiritual fatherhood and constitutes a vivid sign of the future world to come. “Indeed kl, celibacy has a many –faceted suitability for the priesthood…through virginity, then or celibacy observed for the kingdom of heaven, priests are consecrated to Christ by a new and exceptional reason (PO 16).
Optatamtotiusspeaks of the need for training for the state of celibacy. The candidates to priesthood should know why it is important for the ministry of priest. (OT 10).
SacerddotaliscaelibatusEncyclical of Pope VI was written in 1967, at a time when some people questioned the need for mandatory celibacy. It echoes the Catholic tradition in extolling the priestly celibacy. It draws out, from the Scriptures the explicit connection between the celibacy of Jesus and his redemptive work. The Holy Father pinpointed three “significances” to celibacy: the Christological, the ecclesiological and the eschatological.
In the Christological sense, a priest must look to Christ as the ideal, eternal priest. This identification permeates his whole being. Just as Christ remained celibate and dedicated his life to the service to his father and all people, a priest accepts celibacy and consecrates himself totally to serve the mission of the lord. The total giving and commitment to Christ is a sign of the kingdom present here and now.
In the ecclesiological sense, as Christ was totally united to the Church, the priest through his celibacy bonds his life to the Church. He is better able to be a minister of the word of god, listening to that word, pondering its depth, living it and preaching it with whole-hearted conviction. He is the minister of the sacraments, and especially through the mass, acts in the person of the Christ, offering himself totally to the Lord. Celibacy allows the priest greater freedom and flexibility in fulfilling his pastoral work: “celibacy gives to the priest, even in the practical field, the maximum efficiency and the best disposition of mind, psychologically and affectively, for the continuous exercise of a perfect charity. This charity will permit him to spend himself wholly for the welfare of all, in a fuller and more concrete way.”
Finally in the eschatological sense, the celibate life foreshadows a freedom we will have in heaven when perfectly united with god as his child (Sacerddotaliscaelibatus, 33&34).
The law of celibacy is affirmed, not because sexuality is bad or the body is evil. The pope refuses to speak of ministerial celibacy without mentioning the grace of marriage. Thus, Christian couples walk together their heavenly fatherland in the exercise of mutual love, in the fulfilment of their particular obligations, and in striving for the sanctity proper to them. But Christ, ‘Mediator of a superior covenant,’ has also opened a new way , in which the human creature adheres wholly and directly to the Lord, and is concerned only with him and with his affairs; thus, he manifests in a clearer and more complete way the profoundly transforming reality of the New Testament”(Sacerddotalis caelibatus,20)
The practice of celibacy is not the principal reason for the shortage of priestly vocation (cf. 35-49). The relation between celibacy and human values are explained and Pope Paul VI did not subscribe to the idea that the practice of priestly celibacy was contrary to human nature (Sacerddotaliscaelibatus, 50-55). Part II of this encyclical is concerned with formation for celibacy, priestly life, means to foster celibacy, etc., this encyclical was criticized by many and some were disappointed. Pope Paul VI made it clear that the celibacy of ordained ministers in the Catholic Church would not be given up.

Synod of Bishops 1971
Under the theme of ministerial priesthood, the synod discussed the problem of celibacy as it was again questioned by many at that time. There was an unprecedented cry for optional celibacy, some of the national synods like the synod of Holland voted for optional celibacy. But the Synod of Bishops in 1971 repeated the traditional teaching on priestly celibacy. 
1)      The basis for celibacy consists in the apostolic following of Christ.
2)      Motives of celibacy are seen as the absolute Love God; it is an eschatological sign of the world to come.
3)      The synod affirmed that celibacy be kept in the Latin Church.
4)      It elucidates the issues such as conditions favouring celibacy, prayer life, love of God and neighbour, social relationships, companionship with other priests, training to the candidates to the priesthood.
5)      The synod maintained that marred men should not be ordained. The Synod adopted the following formula, “Excepting always the right of the supreme pontiff, the priestly ordination of married men is not permitted, even in particular cases”.
Pope John Paul IIin his Letter to all the priests of the Church (Holy Thursday 1979) speaks about priestly celibacy.
He refers to the previous documents that deal with the celibacy of priests. He affirms that celibacy is for the sake of the kingdom of God. He considers priestly celibacy is a heritage of the Latin Church.He expounds that it is a treasure in the tradition and practice of the church.Celibacy is valued in the context of marriage. The pope proposes in this letter that celibacy is not only an eschatological sign but also it has a great social meaning. It is for the service of the people. A priest becomes a man for others in his commitment to celibacy. The heart of the priest must be free; celibacy is a sign of freedom and it helps the priest to become a spiritual father to all.
Pastores dado vobis( Apostolic Exhortation of Pope John II, 1992) reaffirms the necessity of education for priestly celibacy (PDV 44)
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1992
It also affirms that celibacy is  a sign of this new life to the service of which the church’s minister is consecrated; accepted with a joyous heart celibacy radiantly proclaims the reign of God (CCC, 1579, cf. also CCC, 1580, 1599).



Directory on the Ministry and Life of Priests, 1994
The directory deals with the priestly celibacy under 4 points:
1) Steadfast Will of the Church
“Convinced of the profound theological and pastoral motives upholding the relationship between celibacy and the priesthood, and enlightened by the testimony which confirms to this day, in spite of painful negative cases, its spiritual and evangelical validity, the Church has reaffirmed in Vatican Council II  and repeatedin teachings of the Pontifical Magisterium the ‘ firm will to maintain the law which requires celibacy freely chosen and perpetual for candidates to priestly Ordination in the Latin rite” (57). Celibacy, in fact,is gift which the Church has received and desires to retain, convinced that it is good for the Church itself and for the world.
2) Theological Spiritual Motives of Celibacy
“Like any evangelical value, consecrated celibacy should be seen as that liberating novelty which the world, especially today, demands as a radical testimony that following Christ is  a sign of the eschatological reality . ‘Not all can understand it, but only those to who it has been given. For there are eunuchs…let him understand (Mt 19:10-12)” (58)
3) Example of Jesus
“The example is Christ, who in going against what could be considered the dominant culture of his time freely chose to live celibacy. In following him the disciples left everything to fulfil the mission entrusted to them (Lk 18:28-30). For this reason, the church from apostolic times, has wished to conserve the gift of perpetual continence of the clergy and choose the candidates for Holy Orders from among the celibate faithful ( 2 Thes 2:15; 1 Cor 7:5; 1 Tim 3:2; 5:9; Tit 1:6-8)” (59).
4) Difficulties and Objections
The directory mentions about the cultural climate of today which undervalues the genuine sexuality. As a result the value and meaning of priestly celibacy in not well understood and appreciated. Further the directory refers to the difficulties as well as the objections of priestly celibacy. It is clear that in order to guarantee and protect this gift in a climate of serenity and spiritual progress, possible difficulties for the priests should be avoided by use of appropriate measures. (60)
5. Celibacy for the sake of Kingdom
From the above explanations we understand that celibacy in the church is ultimately for the sake of kingdom. Jesus does not establish a precise relation between priesthood and celibacy but he says it is for the sake of the kingdom of God. May be he means to say that the kingdom of God is not something external alone, it enters the self and take hold of the person, demanding him to renounce marriage and family. Let us not take it to mean that celibacy is required for everyone to enter into the kingdom of God, rather to build it up, to contribute to its growth and expansion. It is a complete dedication to the kingdom of God. Celibacy anticipates in a limited sense the heavenly condition where all are like angels (Mt 22:30).Jesus praises voluntary celibacy after asserting the indissolubility of marriage (Mt 19:10-12). The purpose may be to show the close connection between the priestly celibacy and permanence of marriage. The ordained person who accepts celibacy and the man who remains faithful to his wife respond to different motives. The first does it for the sake of the kingdom of heaven and the second does it for not dividing what God has united (Mt 19:6). We can point out perhaps two motives of Jesus’ celibacy. 1) He had the mission of spiritual engendering without being tied up to a particular family. 2) It was an expression of the universality of love.  The purpose of his life was to reveal God’s love for all, so it was fitting that he remained celibate. Without doubt both these motives in a very limited way do applicable to every priest.    
6. Celibacy: A Discipline, not a Doctrine
We also understand that Celibacy for priests is considered as a discipline in the Catholic Church rather than a doctrine. It means that it is more of a Church rule or regulation without being an integral part of the doctrine of the Church. It is based mainly upon the life of Christ and his celibate way of life. That’s why there are always some exceptions to this rule of celibacy. In some of the Eastern Catholic Churches the priests and the deacons were allowed to marry before their diaconal ordination. Exceptions are sometimes permitted in the Western Catholic Church too by the authority of the Pope, when in certain cases married Protestant or Anglican clergy become Catholic they were allowed to lead a married life while exercising the priestly ministry. This was possible as the rule of celibacy is a disciplinary law of the Church and not a doctrine of the Church. In principle it can be altered by the Church. Further, Jesus did not say anything about the law of celibacy. Jesus did not establish any necessary relation between the priesthood and celibacy. The Second Vatican Council has repeated the traditional view that there is no essential and intrinsic relation between these two. PresbyterorumOrdinismentions and praises the priesthood of the Oriental Churches where marriage is accepted (Po, 16).
7. The Value of Priestly Celibacy in a Secularized World
            Clerical celibacy is a gift from God and one of the most significant aspects of priestly life. It is an integral part of priestly vocation especially in the Latin Church which was held in high esteem. It reveals one of the spiritual richness of the Church. It is a commitment and a task which is inherently dynamic because it involves a constant response to God’s call and witnessing to the world.
            Celibacy as sign of God’s Presence: God’s presence is manifested in many ways. Vatican II reminds priests to embrace celibacy and esteem it as a gift which directly symbolizes God’s undivided love and man’s particular response to that love of God. Celibacy becomes a constant reminder of divine charity in a world full of individualistic desires and selfish motives. The free choice of sacred celibacy as always been considered by the Church “as a symbol of, and stimulus to, charity”. Celibacy signifies a love without reservations; it stimulates to a charity which is open to all. Celibacy reflects the richness of both God’s presence and man’s spiritual response.
            Celibacy as Sign of God’s Love for the World: Celibacy always remains a response to the unconditional love of God to man, man desires freely to respond by his total offering of himself through celibacy. Paul VI says that consecrated celibacy of the sacred ministers actually manifests the virginal love of Christ for the Church. Like Christ who gave himself for the sanctification of the world and the salvation of man, celibacy facilitates man’s total dedication of service to God’s people. Celibacy is always embraced in relation to the desire of the coming of God’s Kingdom. Celibacy becomes a sign of hope that man is still capable of dedicating himself to God. Through celibacy, an ordained person proclaims God’s love for the world.
Conclusion
Clerical celibacy is considered most proper to the sacerdotal ministry; it is in no sense depreciation of marriage but is the condition for greater freedom in the service of God. . The ordained ministers of the Church freely and knowingly commit themselves to celibacy, even though they appreciate and esteem marriage, with fidelity in view of the indelible character they received in the sacrament of Holy Orders. The law of priestly celibacy makes it clear that those who accept it are doing so for the sake of Christ and the kingdom and not simply because they prefer to be bachelors.Precisely because the world is full of individualistic desires and selfish motives and has lost the genuine meaning and value of sexuality Church has the duty to promote sexuality as gift of god by priestly celibacy.In the words of Raymond, “Brownprecisely because the witness of celibacy is conspicuously lacking in any other Christian Churches, the Roman Catholic Church has an ecumenical duty to the Gospel to continue to bear an effective witness on this score.”Of course the law of celibacy is not of divine origin but of ecclesiastical origin and therefore it may be abrogated by the church.

  Fr. Albert Leo, CPPS

Precious Blood Missionaries

Encountering the Risen Lord in the Sacraments



Introduction
1. What is a Sacrament?
2. Encountering the Risen Christ in Sacraments
2.1. The Acts of the Apostles
2.2. Easter Faith of the Apostolic Community
2.3. St. Paul’s Encountering Risen Christ
2.4. The Disciples’ Encountering Risen Christ
3. The Understanding in the Tradition of the Church
3.1. The Lord’s Day (Sunday)
3.2. St. Cyprian of Carthage
3.3. St. Ignatius of Antioch
3.4. Sunday Martyrs
Conclusion


Introduction
Edward Schillebeekx was the first one to use encounter theology. His idea was based on Scripture and Tradition. He was the first one to articulate this encounter theology. According to him, sacraments cannot be studied in a compartmental manner. He begins with Christ and comes to the Church and then deals with sacraments. Christ is the primordial sacrament and the Risen Lord historically continued in his Church. Since the church is the sacramental expression of the encounter between man and God in Christ, whenever the sacrament is celebrated this encounter is renewed. Every act of Christ is rooted in the eternity of the divine nature of Christ. Therefore, it persists eternally. The sacrament gives the eternally subsisting act of Christ its historical celebration reenacts the personal encounter between God and the human person in Jesus Christ. The efficacy of the sacrament is realized by this encounter. So sacraments are the very same acts of Christ sacramentally presented to us and hence effect grace in the recipient. The celebration of the seven sacraments at different moments of life is meant to help us identify with Jesus Christ throughout our lives. Encountering the Risen Lord in the Sacraments of the Church seems the best way to describe the comprehensive action of the sacraments. Encounter allows scope for the free and sovereign action of God in creation and also leaves space for humankind to respond to that action in freedom. It is a meeting to which we come without an agenda expect that of being totally at the disposal of God. Sacrament as encounter with the Risen Lord uses the interpersonal model relationship. Edward Schillebeeckx used phenomenology to interpret the sacramental action. In His work: Christ the sacrament of the encounter with God was epoch- making as it stressed the relational aspect in sacramental celebration. The Sacraments are the gifts of the Risen Christ to us and to the Church. They give us God’s life. They make God’s life grow in us. They empower us to be in the Church and to bring Christ to the world.
1. What is a Sacrament?
            A Sacrament is an outward sign of inward grace by which grace is given to our souls.
2. Encountering the Risen Christ in Sacraments
The meeting of Risen Lord with the two disciples on their way to Emmaus narrated in the Gospel of Luke (24:13-35) is a proof text that the believers encounter the Risen Christ in the celebration of sacrament. When Jesus joined with them on their journey, they said, “The Chief priests and our rulers handed him over to be sentenced to death, and they crucified him; but we had hoped that he was the one who was going to redeem Israel. And what is more, it is the third day since all this took place. In addition, some of our women amazed us. They went to the tomb early this morning but didn’t find his body. They came and told us that they had seen a vision of angels, who said he was alive. Then some of our companions went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said, but they did not see Jesus”. (Lk 24:20-24).
The disciples witnessed the death of Jesus and heard about the glorious resurrection from fellow witnesses. However, they failed to believe the witness and left Jerusalem against the instruction of the Lord to stay in Jerusalem till the power from high came upon them. In their conversation reported in the gospel they express their disappointment to Jesus himself without knowing that it was the Risen Lord. The entire meeting has sacramental underpinning. Jesus first explains the Scripture to them, especially all that is written about him: “And beginning with Moses and all the prophets, explained to them what was said in all the scriptures concerning himself” (Lk 24: 27). The encounter did not stop with the proclamation of the word of God. The proclamation of the word of God prepares the way for recognizing His glorious presence in their midst in the celebration of the Eucharist, “their eyes were opened”.
The Journey to Emmaus was indeed a journey of faith for the two disciples. In the encounter, it is important to notice the action of Jesus: “When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me” (Lk 22:19). It is the same Eucharistic action that Paul attests to in the Christian Tradition: “For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me’” (I Cor 11: 23-24).
The NT texts like these attest to the fact that it was during the Eucharistic celebration the Christian community encountered the Risen Christ. When they participated in a Koinonia that brought them together to recall what Jesus did (anamnesis) in his life and live out its meaning in the present. Therefore, encountering with the Risen Christ in the Sacrament of Eucharist was not a static reality as if one meets a famous personality takes a pictures and leaves with that photo. The sacramental encounter with the Risen Lord was a dynamic reality that moves to live or transform that experience in Christian living. In every sacramental moment we raise our minds and hearts to God. In the word and rite of the sacrament we open ourselves totally to the effect of the sacrament in our bodiliness. The effect to the sacramental action (res sacramenti) is to make us experience unity with Christ and with one another in the Church.
2.1. The Acts of the Apostles
       The Acts of the Apostles present to us several evidences of early Christians celebrating sacraments, especially the celebration of the Holy Eucharist. In the celebration of the Eucharist, the members of the NT community realized that they came together around the glorified presence of the Risen Lord in their midst: “they continued steadfastly in the teaching of the apostles and in the communion of the breaking of bread and in prayers . . . praising God and being in favor with all the people” (Acts 2:41-47). The sacramental life of the early Church was occasional, meaning, gathering once a year or only on some special occasions. For the NT community, sacramental celebration was the essential mark of Christian identity. Throughout history, including our own time, sacramental celebration remains as a mark of our Christian identity. Vatican II explains it in the following words:
From that time onwards the Church has never failed to come together to celebrate the paschal mystery: reading those things "which were in all the scriptures concerning him" (Lk 24:27), celebrating the Eucharist in which "the victory and triumph of his death are again made present", and at the same time giving thanks "to God for his unspeakable gift" (2 Cor. 9: 15) in Christ Jesus, "in praise of his glory" (Eph1: 12), through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Such celebration was not merely a ritual act, but one sacramental transformed their lives so as to live the love of God by loving one another (Acts 2:44-47). It was this community with the sacramental celebration as its essential mark of Christian identity that constituted the Church, a visible reality that owed its origin to the mystery of God becoming visible in the person of Risen Christ. The proclamation of Jesus in his life, death and resurrection made an impact on his followers who came together to share their faith in him.
2.2. Easter Faith of the Apostolic Community
The Easter faith of the apostolic community was centered on the Risen Christ and the community looked for symbols to express its faith in him. These symbols were found already in the Jewish rituals and assumed new meaning from the Christ event. This meaning was gradually recognized by the Christian community. Some of the Christian rituals were prefigured in the OT, especially those that were concerned with Baptism, (and Confirmation) and Eucharistic assembly, all of which are explicitly alluded to in the texts of the NT. Evangelists such as Matthew and Mark writing to the Jewish audience of their time demonstrate how the past promises made in the OT were fulfilled in the NT. Similarly, God's saving action that was signified in the OT through ritual celebrations found its final and definitive expression in the person of Risen Christ. The seven sacraments of the Church belong to the New Dispensation and actually symbolize Jesus Christ, whereas the sacraments in the Old Dispensation point to a future event: Jesus Christ.
            When the Church celebrates the death and resurrection of Christ, it does not simply recall a past historical event. Rather, it celebrates the mystery of salvation “sacramentally,” and in calling to mind the death and resurrection of Christ it actualizes or renders present their mysterious efficacy. In the Easter vigil Christ applies the saving power of his death and resurrection to the Church in a privileged way, and the means by which he does this, is the very celebration of that death and resurrection by the Church. In its content, the Easter vigil is a commemoration of the exodus of the Old Testament people, as well as of the death and resurrection of the Lord; it brings out the presence of the Risen Christ in the assembly of the people the new covenant through the sacraments.  
2.3. St. Paul’s Encountering Risen Christ
            St. Paul, who had not known the historical Jesus, but experienced Christ the Risen One, spoke of the power of Christ's resurrection. “I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the sharing of his suffering by becoming like him in his death, if somehow I may attain the resurrection from the dead.” (Phil. 3:10-11).

2.4. The Disciples Encountering Risen Christ
            Peter's experience of the merciful compassion of Jesus was an experience of deep spiritual conversion and resurrection. Jesus asked Peter three times if Peter loves him, each time referring to a higher type of love. Three times Peter professed his love for Jesus but with a major change in the process because this encounter with the Risen Christ changed Peter bragging about his own fidelity (Jn. 13:37, Lk. 22:33, Mk. 14:29-31) to acknowledging his complete dependence on Jesus even in his very love for Jesus. So with this new grace of the Holy Spirit from the Risen Christ, Peter boldly proclaimed the Good News and led the other apostles in testifying to the Risen Christ. On the evening of that first day of the week, even though the disciples had locked the doors of the place where they were for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood before them, "Peace be with you," he said. (Jn. 20:19). The disciples of Jesus were hiding for fear that they might be arrested, too. There was a guilty feeling among them for running away and leaving Jesus alone to be captured. It was in this context of fear and guilt that the Risen Christ appeared to them and offered his gift of peace as he said "Peace be with you." Their hearts were set free of guilt and fear and they felt the incredible joy of meeting the Risen Christ who brought them reconciliation before God and among one another. They were freed now to live empowered and sharing in his Risen Spirit. Mary Magdalene, the two disciples on the way to Emmaus, Peter, Thomas and the other apostles encountered the Risen Christ. They could not remain the same after experiencing the power of the Risen Christ.
3. The Understanding in the Tradition of the Church
3.1. The Lord’s Day (Sunday)
            The fundamental importance of Sunday has been acknowledged during the two thousand years of history and emphatically restated by the Second Vatican Council: “Every seven days, the Church celebrates the Easter mystery. This is a tradition going back to the Apostles, taking its origin from the actual day of Christ’s resurrection – a day thus appropriately designated ‘the Lord’s day’ ” (SC. 106). The Lord’s day brings the joy of resurrection and it is a fulfillment.
Dies Domini
Pope John Paul II, who left rich liturgical legacy for the Church, on the threshold of the Great Jubilee year 200, wrote a beautiful Apostolic Letter titled Dies Domini which was published on 31st May 1998 explaining the meaning of Sunday and calling for a renewed reflection on this long cherished practice of the Church. John Paul II emphasizes the community aspect of the Sunday celebration at the pastoral level. He also says, “the day of the lord is the day of the Church. The church comes as one community to meet the Risen Christ”.   He also portrays, “For the Christian Sunday is above all an Easter celebration, wholly illumined by the glory of the Risen Christ. It is the festival of the “new creation””. (DD 8) “We celebrate Sunday because of the venerable Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ” (DD 19). “The out pouring of the Holy Spirit was the great gift of the Risen Lord to his disciples on Easter Sunday” (DD 28).  “Sunday is the day of joy and the day of rest precisely because it is “the Lord’s day”, the day of the Risen Lord”. (DD 82)
3.2. Cyprian of Carthage
            He explains about encountering the Risen Christ through Baptism by saying “As soon as the stain of my former life was washed away through baptism’s birth-giving wave, a calm pure light filled my breast. A soon as I drank of the heavenly spirit and was given a new manhood through a second maturity, in an amazing way doubts began to vanish, secrets started to reveal themselves, what was dark grew light, apparent difficulties cleared up, seeming impossibilities disappeared. Thus his personal testimony based on his experience confirms what is revealed in Scripture, because the Bible teaches that baptism is new life (Jn 3:3-5). Over the course of centuries baptism had evolved from a simple bathing, signifying washing sins and new life in Christ. It is necessary therefore, that considering the fallen state of man that he has to be buried from his fallen-ness so as to inaugurate his new life of grace in his encounter with Christ. Therefore in each reception of the sacrament of baptism, we are encountering the Risen Lord who calls us into a deeper relationship with him.  Through the Sacrament of Baptism, we are united into the Risen Lord. [Rom. 6:3-4; Col. 2:12-3].
3.3. St. Ignatius of Antioch
St. Ignatius of Antioch (ca. 107) makes the Sunday celebration as a badge of identification for Christians and a sign distinguishing them from those who follow the old order of Sabbath. He said, “Those who used to live according to the old order of things have attained a new hope and they observe no longer the Sabbath but Sunday, the day on which Christ and his death raised up our life.
3.4. Sunday Martyrs
            On 12th February 304, thirty-one men and eighteen women were arrested in Abitina (Tunisia) for unlawful assembly and they were presented before the Proconsul Anulinus in Carthage. The unlawful gathering was the Sunday liturgy. They are called “Martyrs of Sunday”. These martyrs of the North African town of Abitina confessed, “We cannot live without the dominicum (Sunday Lord’s Supper). Sunday Martyrs encountered the Risen Christ.
Conclusion
The Risen Christ enlightens us. Jesus breaks open and interprets the scriptures. Sacramental moment is presented as a gift “When at table Jesus took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them” (Luke 24:30). The Word alone was insufficient. The encounter is completed with this gift of a sacramental gesture. Finally, the Lord vanishes, and their future is changed as they turn around to head for Jerusalem, the center of Christ’s saving actions. What Emmaus, and all Resurrection stories teach us, is that encounters with the Risen One spark change. These encounters are not limited to the days after the Resurrection but continue in the sacramental ministry of the Church. We meet the living and risen Christ in the sacraments. From them we are sent. “Go in peace to love and serve the Lord.” “You have been freed from all your sin. Go in peace.” “You are no longer two flesh but one. You are now husband and wife.” These are phrases from the sacraments that witness to the tremendous transformative power they release. The sacraments change us and strengthen our identity with Risen Christ. The Eucharist is the memorial of the crucified and risen Christ, i.e. the living and effective sign of his sacrifice, accomplished once and for all on the cross and still operative on behalf of all humankind. The biblical idea of memorial as applied to the Eucharist refers to this present efficacy of God's work when it is celebrated by God's people in a liturgy.


 Fr. Albert Leo, CPPS
Precious Blood Missionaries