Thursday, 8 November 2018

Exegetical Analysis of Jeremiah



Introduction
Prophets come from all walks of life, some seem to have wide variety of life and deep acquaintance with various aspects of live and works in Israel: there were shepherds, fruit collectors and wine dressers, priests, scribes, etc.,
Etymology
Prophet (Prophetes Greek word) may give 3 different meanings:
1.      Before hand- one who foretells the future
2.      On behalf of - one who speaks in the name of God
3.      In front of - one who stands in front of the people representing god
Religiously they were 'spokes men,' politically some were nominated by kings, socially those who interpreted the times those who explained science and philosophers too. But all of them did an oral ministry.
The word Nabi is used in the Hebrew Bible in two ways to indicate three sets of people: prophets, false prophets and other prophets.
Ø  Nb (Arabian Root) means to bubble out referring to the ecstatic prophets. Ezek 37: 10 uses as Hitnabbi which means to prophesy; in 1Sam 18:10 the term used means to enter into ecstasy.
Ø  Nabu (Akkadian word) means “Calling”. The Hebrew word Nb is passive in form, meaning one who has been called. To support this theory we have plenty of call narratives in the Bible, Ezek 1-3, Amos 7-13, Isa 6, Jer 1:4-10, Isa 40:38 - among all these narratives Jeremiah’s call narrative seems to be more unique.
Ø  There are other words also that denote prophets Roeh (Seer - used in North Israel), Hazah (Visionary - used in Southern Israel), Hoem -Dreamer, Ish ha Elohim - man of God, Hebel Nabiim - Band of prophets (1 Sam 10: 10), Bene Nabiim - Sons of Prophets (1 kgs 6:21). Sons of Prophets does not mean any of physical relationship but of a bond of living together. There were times when the senior prophets who choosing their disciples, but we see also some prophets who do not belong to this guild or band but getting the direct commission from God (Amos 7: 14-15, Jer 1: 4-10, Ezek 2:1-10).
Prophets were men of God, called for a particular mission
            Prophets were chosen and equipped by God to read and interpret the event and signs of the times. They perceived things from the perspectives of God to declare them to the people on behalf of God through their lives and words. The phenomenon of prophecy in the Israelite religion is unique. The prophetic personages of Israel have various special features: they read the present and look into the future. They admonish the kings, confront those in the authority and the false prophets challenge the rich & the powerful and speak for the poor and the oppressed. They tend to discern the plan of God for the people of God in the national and international arena.
            Right understanding of the prophets will enable us to interpret the social situation in a right perspective. The prophets teach how to read the signs of the times. The NT perceives the prophesies of the prophets as the fulfillment of the OT and understand Jesus as the prophet who is to come as told in Deut 18:15 “the Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you from your brethren… him you shall heed” . The original duty of the prophets is mediation and interpretation of the “divine mind and will’ for the people. Only prerequisite was the divine inspiration. Prophets came from all walks of life.
            A prophet is the one who has been called by God to mediate between God and people and deliver the message of God in oracular form and the message should be community oriented. They were never been reluctant to pick up the moral tone of the leaders of Israel to condemn their deep insensitivity to evil and injustice. 
Social and historical context of Jeremiah
            The period of Jeremiah is the period of political transition. The life and preaching career of Jeremiah fall with in the context of the year’s 627-587B.C.E and little later. This period could be divided in to five sections
1)      Divided kingdom up to the period of Josiah
2)      The period of Josiah and reform (640 -609BCE)
3)      From the death of Josiah right up to 597 BCE)
4)      Time between the exiles (597-587 BCE)
5)      After 587 BCE).
The Message of the book of Jeremiah
            Jeremiah’s message and theology comes from concrete life situations. His theology deals with the idea of conversion. His message can be approached from two perspectives i) his message for the immediate audience ii) his message to the future generation.
(a) ‘God’ in the preaching of Jeremiah
      the omnipotence of Yahweh is well stated in some of his metaphors. Ex: Yahweh is the ‘foundation of living waters’ (2:13)
      Potter, it is he who directs the history of Israel right from her election (18:1-12)
      Jeremiah too amidst his strong words of doom has some warm imageries of God just like deuteron-Isaiah (2:1): Yahweh as husband (2:2) father (3:19) some of the deep theological Hebrew loyal (hesed) he had loved Israel with an everlasting love and despite Israel’s disloyalty he prolonged his love for her (31:3)
(b) Israel, the Nation and the individual
            Jeremiah always recognized the election of Israel and appreciated her with metaphors. He compares both the kingdoms Judah and northern Israel to two families (Bahar) (33:24) further Israel is the first fruits of the land( 2:3) a choice vine (2:21) the beloved(11:15, 12:7) Yahweh’s own heritage (12:7-9) . Jeremiah introduces the individual or personal responsibility in the realms of redemption and restoration (18; 31:31-33)
(c) Sin and Repentance
            Jeremiah’s central message evolved around the theme of sin and repentance. He brings variety of imageries like guilt or iniquity, rebellion, sin evil. The sins of Israel falls into two major categories: i) worship of false gods ii) a serious degradation in personal and social morality. Jeremiah used the nuance of the verb to ‘return’ (sub) when Jeremiah found that even after his constant persistence that the people do not seem to repent nor renounce their evil ways he declares them, that it is not the magnanimity of Yahweh fall short in forgiving the sins of the people, rather it is the stubbornness of their heart. (3:22; 14:7-10; 19-22)
(d) Future Hope
             Jeremiah’s message does not stop with the pronouncements of the severe divine judgment but transcends to a bright future where the purified Israel ‘will enjoy the fruits of the new covenant’ 31:31. The law (Torah) will be written on their hearts and they will have renewed relationship & worship of Yahweh. A new hope is injected into the hearts of the people in terms ‘messianic promises’. Jeremiah was sure that Yahweh will raise a righteous branch for David’ who would deal wisely and perform justice and righteousness in the land (23:5-6 33:15-16)
(e)The idea of Covenant
            Jeremiah was not so shy. This is exactly what he wanted to put across to the exiles. Already in (5:20-25, 14:22, 17:1, and 18:13-15), he emphasized that the people’s evil ways stand directly against God’s desire to help them and free them. As (17:1) puts it, their sin was written in stone on their hearts and they absolutely could not respond to God’s covenantal offer. God will not only drop his people altogether he will fashion an even better relationship with them. The hoped for change would be so great that the teachers and priests and wise who labored so hard to pass on the traditions and the faith would not even are needed. For Israel would know God so intimately and so well from personal experience that they would not have to be taught who this Yahweh was. And the beginning as real experience is the coming forgiveness and mercy as God in restoring the people Israel to their Land. The covenant on Sinai revealed by a God of great compassion and mercy, it was conditioned on the people’s ability to obey the law. Jeremiah foresees the covenant that is totally free gift of union which was born from Jeremiah’s own suffering and uncertainty about God’s presence during his ministry.

The Call Narrative
The event of call has a greater value in the life of any prophet. This call not only an vocation for a new form of life, this also becomes an identity, a strengthening factor, an assurance, a proof for the mission intended. At times the call event becomes a source of proof to prove to others that he is really called, for the prophets like Jeremiah call narrative is more than a mere call story, he was not only assured of a divine commission, but also his call assures of the everlasting guidance of the providential presence.
Types of Call narratives in the Bible
This illuminates directly prophets' understanding of their own personal to be a prophet.
Encounter Experience: this is connected with a mission, identified by the characteristics of the personal motif and is subordinated to the divine message, which is reported as a dialogue between God and the prophet. In this type, the call reports a very personal encounter between and prophet, in which the 'called' individual could express reluctance and even opposition to the call but was appeased with a sign or word of assurance from God. The call narrative of Moses (Ex 3:1-4:17), Gideon (Judges 6:11b-17), Saul (lSam 10:1-16) and Jeremiah (1:4-10) represent the same type of account.
Vision Experience: This literary variant of prophetic call narrative employs a vision, followed by a word of God and one who is called I ready and willing to accomplish the mission. Like the serving spirit, the person is prepared to do the will of the King, who comes in maj esty (Ps 103: 20-21). He becomes part and parcel of God's plan and his work. The call narrative of prophet Isaiah (Isa 6:1-10), Ezekiel (Ezk 1: 3-3:15), and Micaiah son of Imla (Kings 22:19-22) are the most impressive examples of this second type.



Dimensions of Biblical Prophetical call
A) Vertical Dimension of the prophetic Call
This has a limited feature of the prophetic traditions. The vertical dimension of the call narrative show the mystery character of the call. (They receive an immense experience from the divine realm. The God Experience). The prophet reports what he has experienced. Characteristic of such a presentation varies from one of the other. This mystery dimension of prophetic call gave prophets supreme confidence and courage in the authenticity of their prophetic roles.
B) Horizontal Dimension
Each prophet was called within a very particular Sitz-im-leben, to a particular social, political and economical setting. Here the prophets were themselves as the messengers or agents of the divine council, commissioned or deputed by God. So they emerged due to the inevitable need of the society political, social and economical condition. Prophets were heralds whose actions were substantially affected by political as well as social and economic Sitz-im-leben have a vital role into formation of prophets.

Literary Form of Call Narrative - Elements of the Biblical call Narratives
Most of the scripture scholars agree the division made by Noman C. Habel.
1. Divine confrontation,
2. Commission,
3. Objection,
4. Reassurance,
5. Sign.
1. The Divine Confrontation
The choice and the revelation of God to man is shown in 1 :5. This involves a forming God like that of Gen 2:7, one who knows Gen 18: 19, Ams 3:2 and a sanctifier Ex 19:4. The style also resembles the pattern of the vocation pattern of Moses (Deut 18: 18).
2. The Commission
“A prophet to the nations” (1: 13). Usual verbs of commission would be “to end or to walk,” but Jeremiah's mission is articulated through six active verbs: to pluck (1:10, 12:14), “to break down” (1:10), “to destroy”, (1:10, 12:17), “to overthrow”, (1:10), “to build”, (1:10, 2:21,
12:21,32,41). They show both the negative and the positive aspects of his mission.

3. Objection
It is a realization of his total insufficiency, inability, inadequacy, limitation, incapacity and his weakness. This sets the theme of God's creative grace in bold relief as well as stressing the divine initiative in all the call narratives, like that of Moses (Ex 3: 11, 13-15, 4: 1, 10, 13) and Gideon (Judg 6: 1-10). Jeremiah puts forward his youthfulness and inexperience in the ministry and disability in speech as reasons of objections.!
4. Reassurance
This empowers the prophets to execute the mission entrusted to them. God gives encouragement to weak humble beings that have been chosen as his mediators. God promises constant protection, encouragement and His abiding presence to them. The same assurance is found in Ex 3: 12 in the case of Moses and Gideon (Judge 6:16).
5. Sign
It is a public credential of the prophetic commission and restates the mission as well. In Jeremiah's call- narrative; though the technical term of sign is absent, the symbolic act of God extending the hand and touching the prophet’s mouth arid putting His words into it (1:9) serves the same function.  
Call Narrative of Jeremiah
Time: The narrative comes from the time of exile, claiming that the catastrophe of 587 BC. is presupposed in its substance. But it is equally possible that the call narrative stems from the time of the scroll compiled in 605 BC (Jer 36). In that initial compilation of oracles, it would have been appropriate to preface the collection with an account with an account of the call and to establish the nature of the message (Jer 1: 10)
Literary structure pattern
A short period of monarchy (The reign of Saul, David, Solomon) in the history of Israel and it in fact gave rise to a new literary category or literary structure, (Gattung) known as the account of call (means a common scheme among all the call narratives). There is a strong similarity between the call of Jeremiah and the call stories of the other prophets, notably Isaiah and Ezekiel and these ill turn, resembles the call of early heroes such as Moses and Gideon. They share a common pattern. Especially in the call narrative of Jeremiah we can have a be beautiful structure which as follows:
Vocation realization (v 4), Relationship Realized (v 5), The Prophetic Objection (v 6), The Assurance (v 7-9), The purpose of his call (v 10).


The facts emphasized
Ø  Jeremiah had a strong sense of his predestination to his task. No other prophet felt so strong as sense of divine urgency to prophesy; this appears especially in the passages known as the 'Confession' of Jeremiah.
Ø  Jeremiah was not, like Isaiah (6:8), immediately willing to respond to God's call. He protested that he was not eloquent.
Ø  Jeremiah was conscious at the outset of being sent to the nations (verse 4) and of being set over nations and kingdoms (verse 10); he was not merely a prophet of Israel.
Ø  His mission was to include both the negative task of destroying and overthrowing, plucking up and breaking down, and the positive task of building and planting (verse 10).

Exegetical Analysis
Vocation realization (v 4)
It begins with an autobiographical inscription. The call narrative of Jeremiah was put in the dialogical form. The words “come to me” does not go well with the Hebrew statement which could mean as "it was with me," (Mic 1:1, Joel 1:1, Ezek 27: 1). The word travels from God to man. It authenticates the prophet. The introductory formula was followed by his own personal experience with God. Any prophet is nourished by recalling his vocation narrative. Here Jeremiah revisits his call to strengthen himself.
Relationship Realized (v 5)
Thus realization is understood in two levels which are further divided:
Ø  The time element involves, "before, now and after," God forms his prophet in the past to work out in the future whom he knows through and through. The providence of God surpasses the womb. God appoints the prophet for the future mission.
Ø  The notion of person: This pictures the personal relationship between God and the prophet. This relationship is explained in the maternal way. God explains to him about his birth.
1.      Womb: the Hebrew word for womb is Rehem which also means compassion or passionate love. "I formed you in the womb" means more than just simple formation. The divine love surpasses the womb. His compassionate love towards His people starts even before one is formed in the womb. The very life and the growth of life in the womb is by the grace of God. The miracle or the beauty of the childbirth is a gift, the gift from the passionate Lord.
2.      “I formed you”: the Hebrew word for this formation is Yadsar, basically means ‘to design or to form. The word for ‘to create’ is ‘Barah’. In the call narrative of Jeremiah Yadsar is used rather than Barah. This shows the divine knowledge of one's calling; This is to indicate the conscious will of God to choose and form His prophet. This is to indicate that Jeremiah’s vocation is not of chance but of a careful choice. The book of Jeremiah presents the concept of womb, very high and low, in the context of vocation. Jeremiah praises the divine formation of himself in the womb, but when he feels lonely and frustrated he curses the womb (20: 15ft). The naked truth is that life outside the womb is not as secured as that of the life inside. Though sometimes he seems to have doubted his call his revisit over his call seems to have strengthened him. But most of all he was nourished by the divine assurance.
3.      “I know you”: The Hebrew word for this phrase is Yada. From the perspective of the Bible knowing does not just knowing all names or some qualities of a person. It means knowing through and through. This verse confirms Jeremiah that God
knows his entire self, the full and the weak self of Jeremiah. This is to indicate to
Jeremiah and to his opponents of his divine mission and divine presence with him.
4.      “I consecrated you”: Through this act God reminds him that God is not only the author of life but also the sustainer and the sanctifier of it. He proves to Jeremiah that he has to be sanctified, be consecrated for the mission. The Hebrew noun Qodes means to set apart. Jeremiah was set apart for his mission. A committed mission needs a proper realization of one's vocation. Jeremiah was explained clearly of his holy choice.
5.      “I appoint you a prophet to the nations”: The universal salvific plan of God was revealed to Jeremiah. It reminds the fact that a prophet is not only for a particular
clan or people, rather one should never forget his role in any situation. For this, universal mission God promises His divine assurance. This appointment also goes
with its own rights and duties which we will be seeing in v 10.
The Prophetic Objection (v 6)
In any call narrative objections are common. “I do not know to speak,” “I am only a youth”. Problem in speech does not mean the dumbness, rather his inability to face people. Jeremiah knew his weakness and the demands of the divine mission, so he came out with his complaints. But God proved to him of His divine assurance. Knowing one's own limitation is the beginning of God's providence. Jeremiah knew himself well but God knew him better.
The Assurance (v 7-9)
This can be explained in the following form: Twofold assurance of God, through His word and by His deed.
Vv7-8 - verbal assurance
V 9- symbolic acts as an assurance.
Verse 7
It was easy for God to fill Jeremiah's empty pot, because he has poured out himself before God. God even instructs Jeremiah what to do and what not to do. This vocation cannot be called as an invitation to Jeremiah. As for some scholars, it seems more of a command, by which God instructs Jeremiah that it was not his mission rather God's mission, so the divine assurance was given in very strong terms.
Verse 8
The divine assurance is the grace actualization. “Deliver you from sudden danger”. Fear not” assures him that it is God who stands and fights for him to assure him of the divine providence. "Of them" may indicate the multiplicity of the opposition against Jeremiah. Among all of them the provident presence of God will be the source of strength to Jeremiah. The assurance makes him to be confident of the fact that this is Emmanuel.
Verse 9
There is an anthropological gesture from God. Can it be a symbolic assurance? Because the term assurance is repeated once again in v .18 (a similar assurance can be seen in Deut 18: 18 with regard to Moses). “The touch” conveys the message that from then onwards the mind of Jeremiah and God are as one. Touch also stands of Jeremiah or Jeremiah as the mouthpiece of God. Ultimately the touch indicates that God is directly involved in the vocation of Jeremiah.
The purpose of the call of Jeremiah (v 10)
The purpose is revealed to Jeremiah here. God gives to those who give more. His mission was explained to him here. With the mission explained among which there are four negative verbs calling forth for the conversion and return and two positive verbs which strengthens the suffering. This is indeed reflected in the life of Jeremiah, he has really lived out his vocation, because of which he has to be opposed by his own brothers’ outburst of suffering. 20:4 may be an ample of his rejection. But the destiny of the prophecy and the destiny of the prophet are one and the Same in Jeremiah.


Theology of the Call
The call narratives emphasizes that God personally called prophets; their task was quite comprehensive in character and the mission comes directly from God and not of human origin. No one could assume for himself the prophetic office. The one who is called surrenders to the God who has called; this is more of God Experience, which leads one to correct certain task, rooted in religious, political, cultural, economical and social traditions. God takes the initiative to call certain individual; no man can merit it by his talents. These we can say as, each call narrative reflect the particular spirituality of each prophet. A call or a vocation is not doing what one thinks God Wants of a person. It is doing that which God wants of a person, the task that God entrusts to the particular person.
Commission or Call
The public nature of Jer 1: 4-10 is readily acknowledged by exegetes, but a different explanation is offered by Reventlow. In a very comprehensive analysis of these verses he interprets them as representing the ordination ritual for a person becoming a cult prophet. It is an attractive thesis, confirming the view expressed here that 4-10 afford no insights into Jeremiah's personality or outlook, but lacks substantiation from other sources for the existence of such an ordination process in the temple cult. The temple is an important matrix for the construction and maintenance of the Jeremiah tradition, but it does not follow from such a setting of the book that Jeremiah was cult official. The story is better read as an account of his commissioning to a specific task being a prophet to the nations. Being a prophet may be a byproduct of obeying such commissions or a perspective, introduced into the stories by the editors, but a 'call' does not make a prophet. What makes a prophet is the possession and delivery of the word at the divine command. The distinction between a commission and a 'call' may be regarded as rather subtle, but a commission is very specific task.
The fact
Any call from God is for the special purpose at times the prophets' vocation is to cry out-to God, to the air, to any open heart; they cry out on behalf of God and on behalf of the poor because no one is listening except God. There have always been three kinds of prophets: Individual chosen, sent and compelled to speak when we see the look at the scripture we can easily turn out this fact. It all shows to us that they lived for word of God, each prophet becomes the message. They embody the word that is to be spoken to this people, at this time, in this place. Their very presence becomes a message in itself. (Cf Isa 6:1-13, Ezk J.-3). The experience of vocation as it is described here has parallels to other prophetic experiences (Samuel). The vocation story of Jeremiah cannot be undermined in any way. His call always forces him to go forward, to accomplish the task of God. The actual difference between the three fundamental narratives in prophetic books (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel), the narrative may be taken as reflecting genuine religious experience, but it all because of the individual experience of the prophet with God. This can be seen more as the product of theological reflection, than of autobiographical recollection. Further we can say this as the prophetic spirituality:
Ø  The prophetic books do not provide any detailed account of Vocation (Joel, Obadiah, Micah).
Ø  It is a distinctive feature of Jeremiah's call narrative (in contrast to those of Isaiah and Ezekiel).
It established the authority of the prophet: he was not simply declaring his own opinions but was declaring the divine word, in both its destructive and constructive dimensions. The call narrative establishes the authenticity of Jeremiah's oracles, in contrast to those of the false prophets, who are so frequently denounced in the prophetic ministry.

In what way the call of Jeremiah is significant? – Answer is found above but scattered.

What is the relationship of call of Jeremiah and his 40 long years of prophetic ministry?
Make the reflection personal to your own self

What does the call mean for you today? – Jeremiah is a celibate and we too are celibates, Jeremiah was opposed by his own people, Jesus was opposed by his own and we too will receive the same treatment. Still carry on the mission of God.



 Fr. Albert Leo, CPPS
Precious Blood Missionaries



Deuteronomistic history deals with the themes of kingship of Yahweh


What do you mean by Deuteronomistic History?What are the theories concerning its authorship and its composition?If it is a Theological History, what are the compositional strategies followed by the historians in recounting the Dtr?Why do we call them both as Kerygmatic and Didactic? Highlight the theology of Dtr.History?Select few passages from historical books and explain the Dtr?


Introduction
Deuteronomistic history deals with the themes of kingship of Yahweh, theology of covenant, theology of election, theology of hope, the notion of retribution, cult, monarchy and social justice etc. Here in this paper we deal with how these themes are presented in the historical books.
1. Deuteronomistic History and their Purpose
1.1 Deuteronomistic History
The discovery of the “book of law” by Hilkiah the priest in the Jerusalem temple in622 BCE resulted in the social and religious reforms by King Josiah (2 Kings 22:8-23:25). These reforms were interrupted by the premature dearth of the king Josiah in the battle at Megiddo pass with the army of Pharaoh Neco of Egypt in 609 BCE. The Deutreonomists who were associated with the king in the reforms turned their interest to another project known as writing the former prophets or the Deutronomitstic History in view of writingthe national history of Israel. They worked out the principles of book of Deuteronomy in the history of Israel. DH extends from the Book of  Deuteronomy to 2kings (7 books).The methodology the Deuteronomists use is not to alter the original source but use the method of reflective speeches or essays as key points in the history. E.g., speeches of Moses (Deut 31) Joshua (Josh1 &23), (1 Sam12) etc. it is more of why of things and events rather than what or how of the same. 
1.2 Purpose of DH
After the death of King Josiah (609), the Deuteronomistic Historians took up the responsibility of writing the history of Israel starting from the pre- settlement era right up to the period of kings. The Purpose of their writing can be enlisted as following:
1)      One of the primary aims is to provide answer to the question why did the Northern Kingdom fall to Assyrian in 722 BCE. Their answer was centered on the Mosaic laws.  “Only the loyalty and fidelity to the covenant of Yahweh can save the people” is their proposition. This is the consistent message of the Deuteronomistic History.
2)      It is to claim Judah as represented by Israel as the whole and to press the claims of Jerusalem to be the capital of Israel and the Davidic king to be the king of Israel. The fact that Judah had been insignificant in the history of Israel and for most of 9th and 8th C BCE had been a vassal state of Israel ruled from Samaria and now the written history presents Judah as the centre of the history of Israel.
3)      Deuteronomistic Historians collected all the traditions and chose from them that are appropriate to them and added them into their history so as to present their theological concern and thus to instruct the people to live as covenantal community.
2. Sources, Authorship and Composition of DH
In composing their account of this six hundred years period of history, the Deuteronomists utilize a number of sources. They began with the fundamental charter of Israel as people of God told in theDeuteronomy code (Deut 12-26). They added a preface, which sets the historical context in the plains of Moab whereIsrael was encamped, awaiting instruction for entry into the Promised Land. The law code itself is presented in the context of a speech by Moses to the assembled Israelites, in which they rehear the events ofMt. Sinai and repeats the covenant law for a second time (hence the name of the book in Greek, Deutero+nomos, the second law).
2.1 The sources for compiling the DH were the following
1)      Individual narrative cycles – speech by Moses: Deuteronomistichistoriansinsert speeches into the mouth of the important personalities of the Deuteronomistic history to make a summary of the history of htat particular period or to highlight the theological significance of that particular era. We find a farewell discourse of Moses in Deut and it ends with a prayer (Deut 32 & 33). Also in the beginning of the Deuteronomistic history book of Joshua (Josh 1;); end of Josua era (Josh ), end of Samuel era (1 Sam ) marked by another speech in etc., 
2)      Stories about Judges: The stories about Judges cover 400 years of history and present the origin of the ancient Israel on the high lands of Canaan in terms of ‘gradual settlement’ model.
3)      Story of David’s rise to power (1 Sam 16- 2 Sam 5). Here a series of stories present the manner in which that David ascended to the throne. Though some of them are of propaganda stories, they do contain Deuteronomistic theology.
4)      Succession story of Solomon – succession narrative (2 Sam 9-20; 1 King 2). These stories justify the throne succession of Solomon after David.  
5)      Elijah and Elisha Cycles – tales and legends about various prophets, especially the great northern figures like Elijah and Elisha.
6)      Chronicles of Kings – Deuteronomistic writers had access to administrative documents from the period of united monarchy as well as the Experts from the chronicles of the courts of both Israelite and Judahite Kings.
2.2 Methods of Presenting the History
®    Periodisation
The Deuteronomistic writers divided their history writing into various segments relating to various era of their respective history. For example the stories about Joshua are grouped together; they are set to present the story of conquest of the Promised Land. The stories were carried from one generation to the other. DH had taken some stories and harmonized them so as to contain their ideology and theology. In the same way one finds various segments of history viz., stories of judges, Davidic period, Solomonic period etc., As mentioned earlier each period is marked with concluding speech by the great personalities of that particular period.
®    Cyclic Narrative (popularly understood as 4s concept)
In the Deuteronomistic narratives one finds the recurring themes of sin, suffering, supplication and salvation. The narratives are composed in such a way they entail these elements. This cyclic way of narrating highlights the Deuteronomisitc theology of retribution, theology of hope and idea of divine election. Further this kind of history writing makes the national history a theological history by highlighting that Yahweh is ever faithful to his promisesand he will save his people (Judg. 2:7-18). The overriding theme in the historical books is that the future of the Israel depends solely in the hands of God and certainly not in the hands of Israel and its military or political powers.  The pattern that emerges from the interplay between these two poles – God’s constant loyalty and Israel’s consistent failure relates and interprets their present exilic situation and injects in them a ray hope.
The cyclic narrative could be applied to Judg. 2:7-18 for further clarification
1)      Israel’s failure in covenant loyalty, its Sin (Judg. 2: 11-13).
2)      Israel’s consequent punishment or Suffering, such as falling into the hands of and under the power of enemies (Judg. 2: 14-15).
3)      The cry to God or Supplication for deliverance (Judg. 2: 16-17).
4)      The intervention or Salvation of God, ever faithful on Israel ( Judg. 2: 18).

®    Pan Israel Ideology
Some of the stories that were strictly pertaining to one or more than one but at any case not all the tribes of Israel. But they were presented in the DH with a national outlook having broader theological perspectives. It is normally said as Pan-Israel ideology.

3. Context of the Deuteronomistic History
3.1 Historical context
When the northern kingdom was destroyed by the Assyrians in 722 BCE, some of the Deuterenomistic historians fled to the south and continued to preserve their traditions and influenced the people of south, including king Hezekiah of Judah (715-688) helped them with his efforts of social reforms. But throughout the long and corrupted reign of Manasseh (686-642 BCE) ,the reformers’ efforts did not find a favorable time. Providentially the favorable time was dawned when young Josiah assumed Judah’s throne. At this time, the Assyrians power was on decline, and therefore efforts of King Josiah become successful and Deuteronomists were part of his reform efforts.
3.2 Religious background
The Assyrians were loosing their political supremacy in the ANE. So, Josiah could promote socio religious reform in his country where Yahwism was revived against the pagan cults. These reform movements attracted the loyalty and support of the Deutronomitstic groups, who at this time emerged from the underground. Josiah in 622 BCE ordered the repair and renovations on Jerusalem temple. During this renovation, the book of law which was believed to be lost was discovered.
3.3 Socio - political background
This Deuteronomistic reform embraced not only religious realm but also social, political and economic reforms as well. It is observable, first of all, in the impassioned and repeated exhortation to faithfulness to the covenant of Yahweh. Only through fidelity to the provisions of that covenantwould Israel continue to prosper and possess the land. The custom of leaving the gleaning of field and vine for the poor the widow, the orphan, and the stranger is but one example of a number of specific measures designed to institutionalize protection for the economically vulnerable (Dt 24: 19-22).

4. Dueteronomistic Redaction
The date of composition of the books DH could be around 560 BC, because the last event described in the last book of this collection is (II Kings 15: 27-30) took place around 560 BC during the Babylonian exile (the exiled Judahite king Jehoiachin was released from prison by evil Merodach 2 Kings 25:27-30). There is no indication of the rising to power of the Persians in Deuteronomistic theology and hence we may assign its date of composition around 560 BC. (But according to Babylonian Court Records it is 561 BC.)

4.1 Editors
It could have been not one editor, but probably a group of persons might have been behind this collection of books. Hence the authorship of this DH could be traced back to the Deuteronomistic School. The editors of this collection of books are referred to as Deuterononistic editors. The Dtr editors tried to deal with the question of existence and destiny of the people of Israel. They concentrated mainly on the cultic lapses of the Israelite kings and not on ethical or political offences. The editors saw many of the disasters as the fulfillment of the old prophesies (Josh 2:43ff, 23:14; 1 Kings 24:2, 20:2ff etc,).
4.2 Modern Scholarship
Martin North is the father of Deuteronomistic history. In his book UberlieferungsgeschichtlicheStudien in 1943 gave a new direction to the study of these books. He put forward the hypothesis concerning Deuteronomistic history. He is the first to propose that there should be one single author from Joshua to II kings. He saw continuity of ideas and literary features. Nicholson and Weinfeld argued that there was not a single author, rather a school of authors, whom they call as Deuteronomistic School. (For the recent developments in this direction refer T. Römer, So Called Deuteronomistic History, A Sociological, Historical and Literary Introduction, London: T&T Clark, 2007, p. 38-41). 

5. The Didactic and Kerygmatic Elements of the Deuteronomistic Historians
5.1 Didactic Elements
Didactic teaching is designated to inform or instruct people on important moral, social, political or aesthetic concepts.In the Old Testament didactic is conceptualized as instructions. As compared to the books of Moses (Torah), that contains direct or mandatory commandments of God – written with the intent of encouraging people to lead a godly life. The purpose of Deuteronomy is exhortation to live according to the precepts of God and covenant. Partly they are historical recitation and instruction. They have instructional dimension of the covenant. In the larger structure of the Deuteronomistic history, the narrative history of Deuteronomist also has the idea of apology.They interpreted exile in the background of covenant and covenant ideals. In a way the Deuteronomistic history invited people to be faithful to God.
            Didactic element has hortatory discourse embedded in it. The speaker urges or exhorts the listeners to perform or refrain from an action. Imperatives and other forms are typically used along with motivational character. Ex: Deborah urges Barak to charge into battle and assures him of the Lord’s protective presence.
            Didactic teachings are summarized as in Dt. 30:15-20:“See I have set before you today life and prosperity, death and adversity. If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God… then you shall live and become numerous, and the Lord your God will bless you. But if your heat turns away and you do not hear, I declare that you today that you shall perish”. Didactic teaching presents conditional promises, “If you observe … you will live; if you do not observe …, you will perish.”As part of didactic teaching Faithfulness to Yahweh was stressed, hence repeatedly the teaching was people must remain faithful to God. “You prove to be loyal to the one who is faithful” (Josh 21: 43-45, alsosee 23:14);individual Caleb (Josh 14:6-15). They must obey the laws of Moses, avoid alliance with the nations and reject the gods of nations. This was the constant teaching in the historical books.
            Thus the main concern of the didactic teaching is to warn Israel of the dangers of assimilation to this environment. Israel’s obsession with idols did not bring success. On the contrary, idolatry brought defeat and humiliation, thus didactically it urges temple loyalty (see Jud 2:13, 6:25-32, 8:33, 10:6) conceived to denounce Israel’s devotion to the Canaanite deity Baal; Samson ended up bringing up Dagon’s temple to the ground (Jud 16:30); Eli’s sons had corrupted the Shiloh cult by their godlessness behavior (See 1 Sam 2:12 -17, 22-25).
            Some of the important didactic teachings are given in parables they relate to the respective literary context equally they holy high theological ideals for ethics and morality. (See Jud 9:8-15 – the parable of the trees; 2 Sam 12:1-4 – Nathan condemns David; 2 Sam 14:7-14 the woman of Tekoa comes to the king for justice; 1 Kgs 20:39-40 Elijah condemns Ahab).
5.2 Kerygmatic Elements
Kerygma is a Greek word which means proclamation, announcement, preaching. Kerygma is the substance of the preaching in the early church. The national history of Israel told by the Deuteronomists contains the kerygmatic proclaimations.The progressive reinterpretation of the original events by later authors is therefore an attempt to understand the continuing action of God towards Israel. It is concerned not with reconstructing a system of ideas, but with the interpretation of a people’s history.
The schema,“hear, O Israel: the Lord is our God, the Lord alone. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart” (Deut 6:5). It is nothing but a kerygmatic proclamation of Israel’s faith, “You shall love the Lord” by observing commandments. Love in Deuteronomy is a covenant word. Relationship between God and Israel is cast in the form of a Hittite treaty. The main theme of the kerygma is “God is one Lord” (Deut 6:5).This very day the Lord your God is commanding you to observe these ordinance. The main focus is to exhort Israel to observe the law of the Lord(Deut 26:16). “The Lord your God will circumcise your heart in order that you may live”Deut 30:6. The way to live in the land is to observe commandments.

6.  Deutronomitstic Theology
6.1 Kingship of Yahweh                                                                              
Before the monarchy, Yahweh was the king of the tribes of Israel (Jud 8:22-23, 1 Sam 8:76.) Even after the monarchy was established, kingship in Israel was not same as that of their other nations. The king had limits of this government (Deut 17). Some scholars are critical of Yahweh’s kingship (I Sam 18). The election of a king is after the command of Yahweh (I Sam 9), the anointing is by Yahweh (I King 17). After all, the king is the choice of God.
6.2 Deuteronomists and Monarchy
Deuteronomy over lays the status of Monarchy. Yet one cannot deny the thoughtful recollection of the pasttribal confederation ideals that were still having great impetus in the village and rural communities.
a) Pro-monarchic arguments: The request for a king came from the people to lead them in war. Philistines were    major threat. It is Saul and David challenged them.We can be like other nations, with our own king to rule us and lead us and fight our battles 1 Sam 8:20 like the Moabites and the Edomites with their hereditary kings and armies. In the book of judges, we find this expression, “each one did according what is good in his eyes” being repeated. When there was king, each was doing, as he wanted. Here we find the people going to Samuel and asking for a king. DH does not negate or condemn monarchy. Later the author wanted monarchy to be under Torah. However, kings are answerable to God.
b) Anti monarchic arguments: In asking for a king, the people did not wish that God reigns over them 1Sam 8:8. However, Israel should be faithful and obedient only to Yahweh. He is her only true king 1 Sam 12:12. The human king will lead the people away from God and make them to trust in kings and chariots and not as God. The will be like other kings. The have rejected the God who saved them 1 Sam 10:18-19. Yahweh, the God must be the king of Israel. The policy of the antimonarchy is also expressed well in Dt 17:14ff.But according to Samuel, a king is the ruler in Israel and he is the head of the theocratic kingdom, he is to be the representative of God. He is to be the instruments thorough which God will work out the ultimate destiny of Israel. He must be subjected to the Mosaic Law and the admonitions and guidance of the prophets. There is an irony in the narrative where Saul goes in search of a donkey and finds kingship I Sam 9-10.
6.3 Theology of covenant
The relation between Yahweh and Israel is not natural or physical as that of their surrounding nations but it is covenantal. This relationship is born out of Sinai bond and it is purely cultic. Both sides of the relationship between God and the people are summed up by Deut.26:17ff. This Sinai covenant is reinforced with God’s covenant with the house of David (I King 8). In the covenant with Israel, no matter what happens; never losing his tremendous patience Yahweh continues to love his people. Israel did not keep the covenant, which caused its downfall. They chose to strengthen armed forces and weapons from near by superpowers. Israel lost her God given land, the temple, ad the head of the house of David that should have lasted forever. God’s covenant love could be seen Jonathan’s love for David.
Elucidation from the narratives of David and Jonathan (19:1-7):The relations between Saul and David came to a crisis because of the jealous of Saul in the continuous success and popularity of David. Now Saul wants to do away with David (v.1) Jonathan the son of Saul comes to know about this tension between them and he warns David of his father’s plan and advised David to hide in a secret place and promises to speak to his father about him (vv.2-3). And with Jonathan’s help, David escapes several attempts of Saul on his life.Vv 41 – 42 Speaks of the departure of David from Jonathan. David who was hiding himself from the hands of Saul finally expresses his gratitude to Jonathan and both of then kissed each other and wept. In v.42, Jonathan sends David in the name of the Lord saying, “The Lord shall be between me and you and between my descendants and your descendants for ever.”
6.4 Theology of election
The first big event in Israelite history is the fact of being chosen by God. The election between God and people is created by a prior act of God. Israel therefore possesses the land not by its own abilities and merits but because of Gods promise   to their ancestors. Since the holiness of the place of cult   or of the Levite class    also depends on God’s election, the inter notion of Deuteronomy can be summed up in the term a theology of election.
Elucidation from the narrative of the Election of David (1 Sam 16):Yahweh was angry with Saul the king and rejected him from being the king over Israel. Therefore, Yahweh sent Samuel to Jesse the Bethlehemite in order to choose one of his sons to be the king of Israel. Then Jesse brought seven of his sons before the prophet and not the last one. But Yahweh did not choose them. Then the prophet asked for the youngest one who was keeping the sheep of his father. And when he came Yahweh said to Samuel arise, anoint him. Here the Lord does not want the kingdom to fall with the rejected king but He wants to preserve it. This election of David shows that a man does not become King or prophet through human initiative, but divine choice. With anointing, David is chosen as the instrument of God and the Spirit of the Lord came upon him.

6.5 Theology of hope
Deut presents a history with hope for the future. In fact, the Deutronomitstic history often threatens deportation as punishment for disobedience.
Cf. (Josh.23:13ff, I Kings 9:7ff, II Kings17: 18 - 23, 21:14ff).In Solomon’s prayer  for the dedication of the temple and in the later additions to it expressly considers that even after the judgment of  Israel in exile, she  might be converted  and confess her guilt, so that Yahweh would hear her prayer and forgive her sins and not reject his people (1Kings 8:46 -50). Any narrative in the book of Deut entails the idea that he who believes God has life. The name of God brings him victory. This is seen in the David-Goliath story.
Elucidation from the Story of David and Goliath (1 Sam 17):The fight between Goliath and David can be compared between men and God. Goliath completely trusted in his human power and the arms that he had his own army men (Philistines) and even the Israelites believed in his human power and so were afraid of Him. David, though was a small boy, his strength was in God and not in human power. The description about Goliath and simplicity of David is described for a long time in the scene. But the fight is very shot, and it shows that with God even the small person can do anything within a shot while. Those Philistines and even the frightened Israel looked how big Goliath was to attack Israel. But David looked how big Goliath not to miss his shot with the stones. It was the victory of God over Godless power. It was a scene of power transferring from Saul to David.
6.6 The Notion of Retribution
God demands sanctity and fidelity to him from those whom he had chosen. Retribution was meant to teach people of Israel that God would not tolerate sin and rebel against him. He will punish his people. For ex. Judge 4:1ff, since the people of Israel disobeyed God, the Lord sold them into the hand of king Jabin of Canaan. God rewards the righteous and the obedient to his will and punishes those who are disobedient. This is summarized in Dt.30:15 -20.
            As a consequence, the relationship with God is a gift that has been given and observance of the law is the appropriate way to live out that relationship from which life and prosperity will flow. In our view, the Deuteronomistic circles understand God’s love to be unshaken by human sin (Dt.7:7-8 and 9:4-7, 13-20; Ex. 32: 7 -14, Num. 14: 11 -15). Individuals may die, but the nation will survive, the covenant may be broken but the relationship remains. So, then, the primary understanding of the law should be that it is a consequence of Israel’s relationship with God – not a condition for that relationship.
6.7 Cult
Another aspect of Deutronomitstic theology is the stress on Yahwistic cult. One of the reasons for the destruction was the contamination of Yahwistic cult by pagan cults. Jeroboam had set up rival sanctuaries at Dan and Bethel against the one at Jerusalem. The Deuteronomistic theology sees this as the violation of the covenantal law.

7. Concluding Remarks
(Make your own theological conclusions following the models proposed below)
7.1Social Implications
In the Deuteronomistic Theology, one finds various feasts in which people come together. In this gathering of the community, the people had the chance of knowing each other and the problems of others so that they could extend their helping hand. Feasts, Temple, King, and Prophets are symbol of God’s presence and mediation for the people. They enable them to form a covenantal community. Further the Deuteronomistic law respects women, shows special concern for the widow, orphan and strangers.  For example there are special  laws to care for the widows, orphan and strangers. Any society that does not care for the vulnerable will soon become non-existent. The growing gap between the rich and the poor and the crimes done against the vulnerable in the modern Indian society is alarming. Further the developments that are achieved are meant for all in the society. Following the DH there must be a conscientization among the  people not only for retributive justice but also for distributive justice and contributive justice.
7.2Religious
Some of the ideas of DH like holy war (Hesem) and blood avenging are really a challenging factorsfor the modern reader. But the religious, covenantal values of Dtr are great eye opener for us in this globalized, commercial world. For example, the tribals are the earliest inhabitants or indigenous people of the country. They are all mutually exclusive, each having the endogamous and exogamous clans with their own names and their own culture, customs, location all practices and life styles. The evil factors of globalization should not attempt to destroy the nature oriented life and culture for them the ‘El confederation’ on the high lands of Canaan of the books Joshua and Judges not only remain a model but also propose a possibility to march towards an ideal egalitarian society where the individual’s rights are respected and safeguarded in the name of God.

 Fr. Albert Leo, CPPS
Precious Blood Missionaries